Bill Overview
Title: Frederick Jobs and Historic Preservation Training Center Land Acquisition Act
Description: This bill authorizes the National Park Service (NPS) to acquire land or interests in land in Frederick County, Maryland, for the Historic Preservation Training Center and related facilities. The NPS may acquire not more than 20 acres in the county to support the physical space, program initiatives, and workforce development capacity of the center. The NPS may acquire land or an interest in land by donation, transfer, exchange, or purchase from a willing seller using donated or appropriated funds.
Sponsors: Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals interested in or entering the historic preservation field globally
Estimated Size: 20000
- The bill authorizes land acquisition for the Historic Preservation Training Center, which is a part of the National Park Service.
- The center focuses on training related to historic preservation, which supports NPS initiatives and workforce development.
- By broadening its physical and program capacity, the center can train more individuals in historic preservation skills.
- The expanded training center could boost job opportunities and skills development in historic preservation around the U.S.
- The demographic interested in this training could include individuals in construction, architecture, history, and conservation fields globally.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on expanding capacity for training in historic preservation, potentially increasing job opportunities for individuals interested in this field.
- Since the policy is geographically specific to Frederick County, Maryland, there will be direct impacts on local workforce development and potential indirect impacts nationwide through training dissemination.
- Considering the total budget, the policy will likely have moderate impacts, expanding existing opportunities and potentially creating new ones, but within a limited scale due to the budget constraints.
- There will be a range of individuals interested in this policy, from those directly in the field of historic preservation to allied sectors such as architecture, conservation, and construction.
- The policy can lead to both short-term and long-term improvements in wellbeing for the individuals directly benefiting from this training, though broader societal impacts might be limited in scope due to the targeted nature of the policy.
Simulated Interviews
Historic Preservationist (Frederick, MD)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the policy will help expand job opportunities in our community.
- The enhanced training center will likely provide more resources for preservationists like me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Construction Manager (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This seems like a great opportunity to gain new skills in historic preservation.
- I would consider taking courses at the center to improve my resume.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Architect (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm not directly impacted, but the policy is promising for those wanting more exposure to preservation techniques.
- Enhancing skills in historic preservation is essential for maintaining our architectural heritage.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Student (Frederick, MD)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This center could provide the internship opportunities I need.
- I'm excited about potential job placements after my degree.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Conservation Specialist (New York, NY)
Age: 56 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More training opportunities in historic preservation will be beneficial to new professionals entering this field.
- Though the direct impact on my work is minimal, it supports my principles of preservation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Urban Planner (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see indirect benefits for urban planning by involving better-trained historic preservationists.
- While the policy doesn't impact my immediate work, it's useful for the field overall.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
University Professor (Chicago, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This initiative could provide more academic research avenues and case studies for my students.
- The center's growth aligns well with the topics I cover in my classes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Construction worker (Philadelphia, PA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this policy as a stepping stone to transitioning into a more specialized field.
- It might open new job positions that are both available and stable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Film Set Designer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 31 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The focus on historic preservation might help me improve my work on films requiring historical sets.
- Though I might not directly benefit, I'd like future access to some of these insights.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Project Coordinator in Non-profit (Boston, MA)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although the project is a step in the right direction, resources might still be limited for small community projects like ours.
- The increase in training capacity is good, but community involvement should also be prioritized.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $8000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The cost of land acquisition can vary significantly based on the availability of donors or willing sellers in the selected area.
- The acquisition could lead to future expenses if additional development or operational activities are planned to expand the training center.
- Policy goals to increase workforce development through training can have long-term benefits beyond the immediate costs of land acquisition.