Bill Overview
Title: Supply Chain Security Training Act of 2021
Description: This bill requires the Federal Acquisition Institute to develop a training program for officials with supply chain risk management responsibilities at federal agencies (defined to include the legislative and judicial branches, as well as the executive branch, of the federal government). The program shall be designed to prepare such personnel to perform supply chain risk management activities and identify and mitigate supply chain security risks that arise throughout the acquisition life cycle, including for the acquisition of information and communications technology. The Office of Management and Budget shall (1) promulgate guidance to federal agencies requiring executive agency adoption and use of the program, and (2) make the guidance available to federal agencies of the legislative and judicial branches.
Sponsors: Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Target Audience
Population: Federal officials with supply chain risk management responsibilities
Estimated Size: 4500
- The bill is targeted at federal officials responsible for supply chain risk management across all federal agencies.
- The legislative text specifically mentions the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal government, suggesting a broad applicability.
- The training program will focus on supply chain risk management, particularly in relation to information and communications technology acquisition, which is a widespread function across the government.
- Government data suggests that there are thousands of procurement officials across various federal agencies, hence the target population is likely to be fairly substantial but not include the entire workforce of any given branch.
Reasoning
- The policy is directly targeting federal officials with responsibilities in supply chain risk management. This means that only a select group within the federal workforce will be impacted.
- Because the policy focuses on training around supply chain security, the primary effects will be professional—enhancing capabilities and potentially reducing stress related to supply chain vulnerabilities.
- The budget constraints suggest a manageable training program scale, limiting the impact to significant change only for those directly involved.
- It's likely that the broader effects on wellbeing will be indirect, permeating through job security and professional satisfaction.
- The policy likely doesn't affect individuals' immediate personal lives significantly aside from job-related stress and potential for career advancement.
Simulated Interviews
Supply Chain Risk Analyst (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am excited about this initiative, as it could enhance our team's efficiency.
- Effective training is crucial for reducing risks and mitigating issues before they escalate.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Procurement Officer (Arlington, VA)
Age: 53 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This program is overdue as the threats are growing.
- In my experience, proper risk management training boosts confidence and performance.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Junior Supply Chain Manager (Denver, CO)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone new, training programs like these are invaluable to climb the ladder.
- The acquisition of knowledge directly impacts our efficiency and skill level.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Compliance Officer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 48 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe I'm already well-versed but there's always room for improvement.
- This could also help streamline processes between departments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Federal Contract Specialist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 34 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Integration of advanced risk management strategies will likely reduce contract complications.
- This training must be comprehensive to cover the complexities we face.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Security Risk Manager (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Constant updates and training keep us at the forefront of security best practices.
- I anticipate refined collaboration techniques from this program.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Senior Acquisition Specialist (New York, NY)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's crucial that we stay ahead of potential threats, and training will help.
- Maintaining updated knowledge is critical for long-term projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Logistics Coordinator (Houston, TX)
Age: 41 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The breadth of this program could help align departmental practices.
- Even small improvements in risk management are valuable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Training and Development Officer (Boston, MA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This initiative places training at the heart of proactive risk handling.
- Investing in personnel development enhances overall organizational health.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Federal Security Consultant (Seattle, WA)
Age: 46 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The training will reinforce current procedures and reveal new ones.
- Continuous improvement in risk understanding is beneficial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 2: $8500000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)
Year 3: $8500000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)
Year 5: $9000000 (Low: $7500000, High: $10500000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The program enhances national security by better equipping officials to manage and mitigate supply chain risks.
- Understanding and managing supply chain risks in information and communications technology is critical given increasing cyber threats.
- The program requires coordination across executive, legislative, and judicial branches, suggesting complexities but also pervasive impact.
- The training program will likely need continuous updates to remain effective as technology and supply chain risks evolve.