Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/1718

Bill Overview

Title: Rosie the Riveter National Historical Park Expansion Act

Description: Historical Park Expansion Act This bill adds Nystrom Elementary School to the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park in California. The Department of the Interior may also add certain other areas to the park. Such other areas must be determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; have a direct connection to World War II home front themes in Richmond, California; and relate to the purpose, significance, and interpretive themes of the park. Interior may enter into cooperative agreements with the West Contra Costa Unified School District and other appropriate public and private agencies, organizations, and institutions to carry out the purposes of this bill. Interior shall coordinate visitor interpretation of the Nystrom Elementary School site with the West Contra Costa Unified School District.

Sponsors: Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

Target Audience

Population: People interested in WWII history, particularly women's contributions, alongside local residents and tourists

Estimated Size: 350000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

teacher (Richmond, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The addition of Nystrom Elementary School is an important step in preserving history.
  • It could provide more local opportunities for hands-on history lessons.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 10 5

tour guide (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An expansion could bring more business to my WWII tour company.
  • I'm curious how the new additions will be integrated into existing park tours.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

retired (Berkeley, CA)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am excited about the possibility of expanding the park.
  • More sites mean more stories and lessons for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe the expansion offers a richer educational tool.
  • It could enhance my studies and future educational efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

small business owner (Richmond, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increasing park attractions may boost local business.
  • The additional traffic might affect the ambience negatively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 7 5

historian (Alameda, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The expansion is a positive preservation effort for WWII history.
  • I hope it attracts more historians and scholars to the area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

student (Richmond, CA)

Age: 16 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It would be cool to have our school part of a national park.
  • Maybe there will be more history projects and fun events.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

retired (Fresno, CA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support anything that preserves military history.
  • I might visit the expanded park sites.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

project manager (Oakland, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Excited for potential community revitalization projects.
  • Cautious about potential displacement issues due to tourism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

freelance writer (Richmond, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The park expansion is great content for my travel guides.
  • Hope it improves but doesn't degrade the local culture.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)

Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 5: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 10: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)

Year 100: $6000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $7000000)

Key Considerations