Bill Overview
Title: Advancing American AI Act
Description: This bill requires specified federal agencies to take steps to promote artificial intelligence (AI) while aligning with U.S. values, such as the protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. For example, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must issue policies and procedures for DHS related to the acquisition and use of AI and considerations for risks and impacts related to AI-enabled systems.
Sponsors: Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Target Audience
Population: People involved in or affected by the global AI technology sector
Estimated Size: 3000000
- The AI industry and tech sectors globally will be directly impacted as the bill may influence global AI legislation trends.
- International businesses that rely on software and AI solutions may need to adjust to align with new U.S. federal standards for AI.
- AI researchers globally who work on ethical AI will be impacted as the U.S. potentially becomes a leader in this discourse.
- Nations that export AI technology to the U.S. may be compelled to adjust their products to meet U.S. standards, impacting their operations.
Reasoning
- The AI industry has a significant and growing influence on various sectors, impacting millions globally, including within the U.S.
- With a budget limited to $100 million in the first year and just over $1 billion over ten years, the policy likely focuses on developing guidelines and enforcement related to AI use in federal sectors.
- It's essential to evaluate individuals from tech companies, researchers, government employees, and consumers who rely on AI-driven products.
- The policy may primarily affect those directly working in AI or related regulations, while consumers may experience indirect impacts.
- AI developers and researchers may perceive positive or negative changes depending on how the policy aligns with their values and concerns, such as privacy and civil liberties.
- Due to the global influence of AI standards, international AI-related sectors might observe similar adjustments or shifts due to the U.S.'s stance.
Simulated Interviews
AI Researcher (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe the Advancing American AI Act is a necessary step towards ensuring AI technologies are developed responsibly.
- I'm optimistic that the act will bolster ethical AI research and encourage companies to adopt more transparent practices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
AI Product Manager (New York, NY)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could lead to additional compliance costs which might be challenging for startups.
- However, clear AI standards might make the deployment more predictable and safer for consumers.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 3 |
Federal Policy Advisor (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Implementing this policy will lead to necessary regulatory frameworks that align with civil rights and liberties.
- I foresee my role becoming busier as agencies develop new guidelines, but aligning AI use with public values is crucial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Software Engineer (Austin, TX)
Age: 23 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone new to the workforce, the policy makes me hopeful for a future where AI respects privacy more.
- I do worry about rapid changes affecting my learning curve, though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Small Business Owner (Raleigh, NC)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm concerned that new regulations might increase the cost of AI software or require expensive adjustments.
- On the positive side, these changes could lead to more robust and secure products.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 3 |
Retired (Seattle, WA)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I appreciate technologies that make daily life easier, but I'm cautious about privacy implications.
- If the policy ensures better privacy protections, that would be beneficial for users like me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
AI Ethics Consultant (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy underscores the importance of embedding ethics into AI design processes.
- While it might create more work, it aligns strongly with my principles and consultancy goals.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Tech Journalist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This legislation could provide significant material for coverage about responsible AI practices.
- I'm keen on seeing how companies and the government align their AI strategies with public values.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 3 |
Graduate Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could influence my research projects and open up new fields to explore.
- I hope educational institutions receive support to adapt curricula in line with new standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Data Analyst (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- AI policies that stress transparency and privacy could impact how data is collected and used, improving accountability.
- My concern is about the day-to-day implications on data processing protocols.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 3 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)
Year 2: $120000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $140000000)
Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $130000000)
Year 5: $105000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $125000000)
Year 10: $100000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $125000000)
Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $130000000)
Key Considerations
- The costs and savings of implementing AI standards must be weighed against potential long-term economic and technological benefits.
- Agencies will need sophisticated tools and personnel to effectively manage AI-related policy implementations.