Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/1116

Bill Overview

Title: Federal Firefighters Fairness Act of 2022

Description: 2022 This bill provides federal workers' compensation to firefighters who contract certain illnesses as a result of their service. Specifically, the bill provides that heart disease, lung disease, and specified cancers of federal employees employed in fire protection activities for at least 5 years are presumed to be proximately caused by such employment if the employee is diagnosed with the disease within 10 years of employment. The Department of Labor must periodically review the bill's listed diseases and conditions and make appropriate additions. An employee in fire protection activities is a firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, rescue worker, ambulance personnel, or hazardous material worker, who (1) is trained in fire suppression; (2) has the legal authority and responsibility to engage in fire suppression; (3) is engaged in the prevention, control, and extinguishment of fires or response to emergency situations where life, property, or the environment is at risk; and (4) performs such activities as a primary responsibility. Additionally, the Department of Interior and the Department of Agriculture must jointly study the long-term health effects experienced by federal wildland firefighters who are eligible for workers' compensation. The bill also requires Labor to revise regulations so as to allow at least 60 days (rather than at least 30 days) for a claimant to submit any additional evidence that is requested by the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs to support a federal workers' compensation claim.

Sponsors: Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE]

Target Audience

Population: Federal firefighters and related fire protection workers

Estimated Size: 250000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Federal Firefighter (California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am really relieved that my condition is recognized as job-related.
  • This policy gives me peace of mind, knowing I won't face financial ruin due to medical bills.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 4
Year 2 8 3
Year 3 9 3
Year 5 8 2
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 5 1

Paramedic (New Mexico)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing that this policy exists makes me feel more secure in my job.
  • I think it will encourage early detection and health monitoring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired Firefighter (Texas)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I wish this had been in place during my active years.
  • It’s a good move, but more retrospective coverage would be helpful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 4 4
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 3 2
Year 20 2 2

Wildland Firefighter (Colorado)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy encourages me to remain in this career path.
  • I’m hopeful it will lead to better health resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Emergency Medical Technician (Florida)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I feel supported knowing that my job's impact on my health is recognized.
  • It’s critical for job retention and satisfaction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 8 4
Year 3 8 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 2
Year 20 5 2

Rescue Worker (Ohio)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a reassurance for the future.
  • Hopefully, it will extend to cover more conditions over time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Hazardous Material Worker (Alaska)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having this safety net changes how we view our jobs and risks.
  • Encourages us to report and treat health issues early.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 2

Ambulance Personnel (Washington D.C.)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s a relief this policy exists; it could be crucial for me down the line.
  • I hope it leads to preventative medical check-ups.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Federal Firefighter (New York)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a lifesaver, quite literally.
  • It ensures I can focus on my treatment without worrying about finances.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 3
Year 2 8 3
Year 3 8 2
Year 5 7 2
Year 10 6 1
Year 20 5 1

Wildland Firefighter (Montana)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I am healthy now, it's good to know there’s a safety net.
  • Would love to see more mental health support too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $41000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $64000000)

Year 5: $58000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $68000000)

Year 10: $66000000 (Low: $51000000, High: $78000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $120000000)

Key Considerations