Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9676

Bill Overview

Title: RARE Act of 2022

Description: The bill reauthorizes through FY2028 the National Institutes of Health Rare Disease Regional Centers of Excellence and expands activities to facilitate research and increase awareness of rare diseases and conditions. (Rare diseases and conditions are those with a prevalence of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States.) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may expand infrastructure and activities to track the epidemiology of up to four rare diseases and conditions and incorporate this information into a National Rare Disease or Condition Surveillance System. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality must expand its activities to increase health care providers' awareness of rare diseases and conditions. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, or another appropriate entity, must update the 2010 report Rare Diseases and Orphan Products: Accelerating Research and Development.

Sponsors: Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]

Target Audience

Population: People with rare diseases

Estimated Size: 28000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

student (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 8 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy would help my doctors understand my condition better and could lead to improved treatments.
  • Raising awareness might make it easier for my family to find specialists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

software engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased research can potentially improve my quality of life through better understanding and treatment options.
  • Awareness programs could reduce stigma and misunderstanding in professional and personal environments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

retired nurse (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could advance understanding of auto-immune related rare diseases.
  • It may also aid in the development of more precisely targeted therapies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

retired factory worker (Des Moines, IA)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this leads to better and more approved treatment paths.
  • Any enhanced infrastructure for data collection is crucial for a condition like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 2

college student (Boston, MA)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increased awareness and research make me hopeful for break-throughs.
  • Better training for physicians means fewer misdiagnoses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

graphic designer (Miami, FL)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Research advancement is needed to improve treatment options.
  • Hope that awareness initiatives will help mitigate the lengthy diagnostic odyssey.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 7 4

freelance writer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy efforts like this can help raise awareness and fuel necessary advancements.
  • Crucial to counteract misinformation and assumptions about sleep disorders.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

retired librarian (Springfield, IL)

Age: 72 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope that more focus will be given to multiple myeloma similarly.
  • Support networks often lack information; hopefully, this will change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

legal consultant (New York, NY)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Focus on research could help in earlier diagnosis and better management strategies.
  • More clinical awareness can only be a positive for those diagnosed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

small business owner (Denver, CO)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Good to know there's potential for more information sharing and support.
  • Insurance hurdles require comprehensive groundwork and understanding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 3: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 5: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 10: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Year 100: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations