Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9675

Bill Overview

Title: Interstate Teaching Mobility Act

Description: This bill authorizes the Department of Education to establish a voluntary interstate teaching application program for participating states. Under the program, a teacher in a participating state may obtain licensure or certification and apply for an open teaching position in another participating state without completing additional requirements.

Sponsors: Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]

Target Audience

Population: Teachers globally seeking interstate mobility for teaching positions

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Elementary School Teacher (Florida)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I just finished my teaching degree and I'm struggling to find openings in Florida.
  • This policy would open up more opportunities in states with teacher shortages.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

High School Teacher (Texas)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm happy where I am and not interested in moving, so this policy doesn't affect me personally.
  • It could be beneficial for younger teachers or those looking to relocate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Middle School Teacher (New York)

Age: 34 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'd love to explore teaching opportunities on the West Coast, but my family is here in New York.
  • This policy could help once I'm ready to move.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Special Education Teacher (California)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate the idea as it might come in handy if my family situation changes.
  • For now, I'm settled in California and focused on my students here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Science Teacher (Ohio)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm nearing retirement and wouldn't consider moving to another state.
  • Younger teachers might be interested, but it's not practical for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Math Teacher (Washington)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I would consider moving for the right opportunity if it benefits my career.
  • The policy simplifies the process and that's appealing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Newly Certified Teacher (Illinois)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a new teacher with limited options, this policy makes it easier to widen my job search.
  • It significantly enhances my chances of finding a position where needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

History Teacher (Arizona)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A move with better pay would be ideal, and this policy simplifies that decision if family aligns.
  • It's an option I'll weigh against family needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Homeschool Coordinator (Georgia)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not in a conventional teaching role, the idea of teaching in another state in the future intrigues me.
  • It's good to know this pathway will be available should I transition back to public education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Music Teacher (Kentucky)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might not change much for me since my ties to the local community run deep.
  • However, for others, it might presents great opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)

Year 5: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 10: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $14000000)

Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations