Bill Overview
Title: Stateless Protection Act of 2022
Description: This bill provides protections for stateless persons (a person who is not considered a national of any state by that state's law). For example, the bill establishes stateless protected status, which shall provide protections against deportation and other benefits to certain stateless persons present in the United States who meet certain criteria.
Sponsors: Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]
Target Audience
Population: stateless persons around the world
Estimated Size: 10000
- Stateless persons are individuals who are not recognized as citizens by any country.
- According to the Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion, there were an estimated 4.2 million stateless people globally in 2020.
- Some stateless individuals may not have been counted in the estimates due to lack of recognition or documentation.
- Protection and legal status can dramatically improve the wellbeing of stateless persons by providing basic rights and security.
Reasoning
- The simulation of interviews includes a mix of individuals from different backgrounds to illustrate a range of impacts, from high impact on stateless persons to no impact on citizens.
- The estimated number of stateless persons in the U.S. is relatively small, so some interviews will show non-impact scenarios for balance.
- With a limited budget and specific criteria for eligibility, not all stateless persons will immediately receive benefits, influencing the distribution of impacts.
Simulated Interviews
freelancer (New York, NY)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 2
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could mean finally having some security without fear of deportation.
- It gives me hope to be able to work legally and have access to health care.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 2 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 2 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 2 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 2 |
warehouse worker (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 3
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Secure status could allow me to trust my employer and get fair wages.
- This gives my family and me a real chance to settle down.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 3 |
student (Chicago, IL)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have lived in fear and uncertainty. This policy will allow me to access more educational resources.
- I can finally apply for scholarships and financial aid with protected status.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 62 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having some legal recognition would give me peace of mind in my retirement.
- I would be able to travel to see my family without worrying I couldn’t return.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
mechanic (Houston, TX)
Age: 41 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy doesn’t really affect me personally, but I support helping those in need of protection.
- It's important for everyone to have a fair chance to succeed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
artist (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support the idea; however, this policy does not change my life directly.
- I hope it helps those in vulnerable situations to stabilize their lives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
unemployed (Boston, MA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 2
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope this policy can make it easier to find work and not fear being deported.
- Finally, I can get medical treatment without being afraid to show my face at health centers.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 2 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 2 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 2 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 2 |
software engineer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't foresee any direct impact from this policy.
- It's good to close gaps that leave people vulnerable, but my life remains the same.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
teacher (Dallas, TX)
Age: 48 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This might help me with the legal side of claiming disability benefits.
- It could mean a better future with health care access and income security.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
retired firefighter (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see the need for protection for stateless individuals and support it fully.
- It is essential support for striving towards equality and humanity.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 2: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 3: $52000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $62000000)
Year 5: $54000000 (Low: $44000000, High: $64000000)
Year 10: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)
Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)
Key Considerations
- The initial setup and ongoing verification processes for stateless status might require substantial resources.
- Coordination between federal, state, and non-profit organizations will be crucial for successful implementation.
- The bill might face legal challenges or require modifications based on international agreements.
- Collaboration with international bodies might be needed to set clear legal precedents.