Bill Overview
Title: Aviation Security Checkpoint Technology Fund Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes the Aviation Security Checkpoint Technology Fund within the Department of Homeland Security to fund the procurement, deployment, and sustainment of aviation security checkpoint technology.
Sponsors: Rep. Katko, John [R-NY-24]
Target Audience
Population: Air travelers globally who use airports for commercial flights.
Estimated Size: 1000000000
- The bill is related to aviation security checkpoint technology, which mainly affects airports and airlines.
- Airports will need to implement new technology funded by this bill to enhance checkpoint security.
- Passengers, who travel through airports in the USA, will experience improved security checks.
- There are over 40,000 airports globally, though not all are for commercial travel.
- There are approximately 9,000 airports with scheduled commercial flights worldwide.
- The global population of air travelers involves billions of passenger journeys each year.
- In the USA, about 1 billion passenger boardings happen annually, involving a mix of domestic and international travelers.
- The TSA and other governmental bodies will be directly involved in implementing and overseeing these changes.
Reasoning
- The fund targets airports, airlines, and passengers in the US.
- The $5.39 billion budget over 10 years suggests significant investment that might lead to improved passenger experience and security.
- Exposure to new technologies may vary across different regions and airport sizes.
- Passengers at major hubs may experience higher impacts due to more intense implementation of technology.
- Airports in less populated regions might experience slower adoption and thus lower immediate impact.
- Implementation will primarily affect passengers who frequently travel.
- Outside of economic effect, environmental and time efficiency impacts should be considered as technologies like these impact airport operations.
Simulated Interviews
Business Consultant (Chicago, IL)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy will lead to better security technology, which I hope reduces long wait times.
- As a frequent traveler, security delays are a common issue, and anything to alleviate them is welcome.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Software Engineer (Dallas, TX)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More efficient technology could mean I have to spend less time being frisked and more time on my work.
- I think this fund should also help make traveling feel safer.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Middle School Teacher (New York, NY)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone who doesn't travel often, I'm not sure this will significantly change my experience.
- Hope it will make our family trips feel safer and more comfortable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Airport Security Manager (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy directly affects my work and could bring much-needed upgrades.
- I'm concerned about the transition phase and any potential disruptions it might cause.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Retired Flight Attendant (Miami, FL)
Age: 62 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a retiree, having seen various security measures, I hope this fund will lead to smoother operations.
- My travel is limited now, so the direct impact on me might be small.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Graduate Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The new technology might make travel feel more secure, which is a relief during times like these.
- I wonder about the privacy implications of more advanced screening techniques.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Small Business Owner (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improvements at security checkpoints will hopefully reduce delays and make travel less of a hassle.
- While I'm hopeful, I remain wary about any disruptions in travel due to new implementations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
College Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Since I fly only occasionally, I'm not expecting much change in my experience.
- The idea of improved security measures is reassuring though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Freelance Photographer (Denver, CO)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I travel a lot for work, so reduced times in lines would be great.
- Technology should help not only with safety but efficiency, I'm hopeful it will work as intended.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Retired Professor (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 66 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm looking forward to seeing how new technologies could expedite the lines.
- At my age, anything that can make travel less tiring is a benefit.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 2: $510000000 (Low: $410000000, High: $610000000)
Year 3: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $620000000)
Year 5: $540000000 (Low: $430000000, High: $650000000)
Year 10: $570000000 (Low: $450000000, High: $700000000)
Year 100: $600000000 (Low: $480000000, High: $750000000)
Key Considerations
- Technological advancements enhance detection capabilities, potentially lowering the risk of terrorist incidents.
- Coordination with the TSA and other security agencies is crucial for streamlined implementation.
- Possibility of disruptions during deployment at airports could affect passenger experience temporarily.
- Budget constraints and funding allocations may influence the scope and speed of implementation.