Bill Overview
Title: Justice for Armored Car Crew Members Act of 2022
Description: This bill makes the robbery of an armored car or armored car company building an offense under the federal bank robbery statute.
Sponsors: Rep. Gohmert, Louie [R-TX-1]
Target Audience
Population: Armored car crew members and their direct associates (including employers and families) impacted by increased legal protections against robbery
Estimated Size: 50000
- The bill aims to enhance the safety and legal protection for armored car crew members.
- In 2023, estimates suggest that there are tens of thousands of armored car crew members globally, given the widespread use of armored car services.
- The bill indirectly affects armored car service companies and customers who depend on the secure transportation of valuables.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on securing armored car crew members, who are essential for transporting money and valuables safely. Their security improvements may also impact companies and individuals relying on these services by reducing crime risks.
- The budget constraints mean the policy must be implemented strategically, ensuring a focus on areas with high robbery incidents and larger populations of armored car workers.
- Different people will perceive the policy's benefits differently based on their proximity to the armored car industry. For instance, a direct crew member may feel more intensely about the policy than a customer of the service.
Simulated Interviews
Armored Car Driver (Houston, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The new law gives me peace of mind knowing that there is now more deterrence against robbers.
- I appreciate the federal support in protecting our profession.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Armored Car Security Technician (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might make our job safer, which is a big relief because last year's incident was terrifying.
- Glad to see the federal government taking this seriously. It makes me feel valued.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Armored Car Company Manager (Chicago, IL)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Enhanced federal penalties are likely to deter would-be robbers, reducing my stress levels.
- A drop in robberies can improve our company's bottom line by reducing insurance costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Financial Institution Security Analyst (New York, NY)
Age: 41 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Seeing the increased legal protections reassures customers of the safe handling of their assets.
- Banks heavily rely on these services, so anything that shields them from robbery reduces our risk assessments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Customer - Store Manager (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 24 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope this new law will make transporting large cash deposits safer.
- This could save us from potential losses and gives us peace of mind.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 63 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- At my age, I'm glad to see such changes aimed at keeping my family member's jobs safe.
- These cars are essential, and any legislative protection is good.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Armored Car Crew Member (Seattle, WA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's crucial for my safety that these legal protections are in place.
- I'm glad to see societal recognition of our dangerous roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Insurance Specialist (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any increase in security can reduce claims and losses, which is great for my clients.
- This law might lead to better risk assessments and lower premiums over time.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Armored Car Driver (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Knowing there are federal laws protecting us makes me feel safer at work.
- Reduces my anxiety about potential dangers, especially during night shifts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Armored Car Operations Director (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The enhanced legal framework should improve employee trust and efficiency.
- Such laws help in recruitment and retaining talent by ensuring worker safety.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Year 2: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Year 3: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Year 5: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Year 10: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Year 100: $2500000 (Low: $1500000, High: $4000000)
Key Considerations
- The enforcement of this policy may slightly strain federal judicial resources.
- Cost savings and GDP impacts rely heavily on how much the legal changes deter robberies.
- Public awareness and industry adaptation will affect the full realization of benefits.