Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9588

Bill Overview

Title: Consumer Information Notification Requirement Act

Description: This bill requires federal financial regulators to set forth rules regarding data breaches. Specifically, these rules must require financial institutions, banks, and other specified entities to notify customers of breaches likely to result in identity theft, fraud, or economic loss.

Sponsors: Rep. Luetkemeyer, Blaine [R-MO-3]

Target Audience

Population: People who use financial institutions, banks, and other specified entities globally

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Software Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's great that there will be transparency regarding data breaches.
  • I expect my stress levels regarding information security to decrease with these notifications in place.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Bank Manager (Boston, MA)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will increase my workload in terms of compliance, but it's necessary for customers' trust.
  • A more informed clientele means fewer surprise issues to manage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 6

College Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am worried about fraud and identity theft, so this policy will help me feel more secure.
  • Instant notification will allow me to respond faster to any potential threats.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Small Business Owner (Omaha, NE)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Protecting my business from financial loss due to theft is critical, so I support this policy.
  • I feel more assured that I'll be aware of breaches that might impact my finances.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 6

Retiree (Miami, FL)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't use online banking much, so I worry less about data breaches.
  • I suppose the notifications would help if there was an issue, but I don't see it affecting me much.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Freelance Designer (New York, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having an immediate notification system is critical for my work as I handle multiple transactions daily.
  • This policy will enhance my trust in the digital payment systems I use.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 6

IT Security Specialist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a step in the right direction but it depends on effective implementation.
  • From my perspective, it will make managing breaches more systematic and transparent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Teacher (San Diego, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm mostly unaware of such issues, but being informed might help me feel safer.
  • It's a good initiative, but I doubt it will change much in my day-to-day life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Warehouse Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't use online banking much, but I still worry about identity theft.
  • If I get notified quickly, I can act fast, which helps me feel more at ease.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will be a net positive for the safety of small businesses.
  • Understanding and being notified of breaches quickly will help mitigate damage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 2: $450000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $650000000)

Year 3: $400000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $600000000)

Year 5: $400000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $600000000)

Year 10: $400000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $600000000)

Year 100: $400000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $600000000)

Key Considerations