Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9577

Bill Overview

Title: Increasing Mental Health Options Act of 2022

Description: 2022 This bill provides for an additional payment for clinical psychologists under Medicare who provide services in designated health professional shortage areas. It also allows clinical psychologists to provide behavioral health services (in accordance with state law) for purposes of hospitalization services, home health services, and other services under Medicare.

Sponsors: Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]

Target Audience

Population: People globally who need improved access to mental health services

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired teacher (Rural West Virginia)

Age: 72 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new policy sounds like it could really help people like me who live in areas where it's tough to see a psychologist.
  • Access to mental health care is very limited, so any extra support is welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired factory worker (Inner-city Detroit, Michigan)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy may help people where I live get the mental health services they've needed for years.
  • It's been hard finding good mental health care around here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired nurse (Suburban Florida)

Age: 88 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I feel grateful that I already have access to the health services I need, but this policy seems like it would help those in more remote areas.
  • Fortunately, I don't feel the lack of services here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Disabled (San Francisco, California)

Age: 55 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With better support, I might be able to handle my mental health issues more effectively.
  • I'm more concerned about how accessible these services will really be, especially considering I live in a city with many options already.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired mechanic (Rural Arizona)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new policy might finally get me the mental health support I've needed for a long time.
  • Access to professional help around here is pretty limited.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired accountant (Suburban Kansas)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the changes might be great, they may not necessarily impact my own access as much, since things are already quite good here.
  • It could, however, help those I volunteer with who live farther out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired police officer (Urban New York)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Additional mental health resources are crucial for someone like me dealing with PTSD.
  • New York has a lot of services, but extra support is always appreciated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired farmer (Rural Alabama)

Age: 73 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully this policy means more mental health professionals coming out to the countryside.
  • We've needed more help for a long time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired engineer (Urban Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think this policy will change much for me personally.
  • It seems like it might help others who don't have the access we do in cities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired (Rural South Dakota)

Age: 84 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This may be one of the few chances for us to get some real mental health help around here.
  • We've been overlooked for so long, but maybe this will bring some much-needed resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 8 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 3: $510000000 (Low: $410000000, High: $610000000)

Year 5: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $620000000)

Year 10: $570000000 (Low: $470000000, High: $670000000)

Year 100: $1000000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1100000000)

Key Considerations