Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9569

Bill Overview

Title: ALERT Parity Act

Description: This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission to facilitate the provision of emergency communication services (e.g., 9-1-1 calls and emergency alerts) in unserved areas. An unserved area is one that has no commercial mobile service capable of providing emergency services because of a lack of infrastructure, destruction of infrastructure, a power outage, or other reason.

Sponsors: Rep. Johnson, Bill [R-OH-6]

Target Audience

Population: People living in or transient within unserved areas lacking emergency communication services

Estimated Size: 15000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Farmer (Rural Iowa)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having reliable emergency services is crucial, especially during storms when power lines go down.
  • This policy could make our community feel safer and more connected to essential services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Retired coal miner (Appalachian region)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more reliable emergency services could mean life or death in my case.
  • If I need medical assistance quickly, every second counts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 2

Tour guide (Northern Alaska)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • For guiding, ensuring visitor safety is our top priority.
  • Improved emergency communications would vastly improve risk management for tourists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Student (Rural Montana)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Affordable and reliable emergency communication is necessary for such isolated areas.
  • I've missed important alerts multiple times due to lack of service.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Vineyard manager (Central California)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our location is fire-prone; immediate alerts could prevent losses.
  • We rely on swift emergency communications for operations and safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Rancher (Texas Panhandle)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An emergency service would be invaluable during severe weather events.
  • Communication darkness is a frequent issue here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Retiree (Heart of the Rocky Mountains)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A reliable way to contact emergency services could save lives here.
  • Avalanche risks are serious, and we need better alerts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

School teacher (Deep Louisiana)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better emergency communication would make families feel safer during hurricane season.
  • We could coordinate school evacuations more effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Wildlife biologist (Remote Nevada)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reliable contact with emergency services is crucial here—for both safety and data communication.
  • The remoteness poses significant personal risks daily.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Innkeeper (Rural Vermont)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Guests would feel far more secure knowing they can contact emergency services at any time.
  • This policy could enhance our business reputation for safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $125000000, High: $200000000)

Year 2: $130000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $175000000)

Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $95000000, High: $160000000)

Year 5: $100000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $150000000)

Year 10: $90000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $135000000)

Year 100: $75000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $120000000)

Key Considerations