Bill Overview
Title: Right to Private Conduct Act of 2022
Description: This bill provides statutory authority for the right of adults to engage in private, consensual sexual conduct with other adults.
Sponsors: Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]
Target Audience
Population: Adults engaging in private consensual sexual conduct worldwide
Estimated Size: 258000000
- The bill affects adults engaging in private consensual sexual relationships.
- The global adult population above the age of consent would be impacted as it acknowledges their rights.
- This is a legislation relevant across jurisdictions where consensual adult sexual activities are currently restricted or not clearly protected.
Reasoning
- The Right to Private Conduct Act aims to legally acknowledge and protect the rights of adults engaging in consensual private sexual activities.
- The act itself requires no direct funding as it's a declaration of rights, but its societal impact may affect personal wellbeing.
- For this simulation, focus on variations in demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical locations in the US population.
- Include individuals not directly affected, as public perception of legal rights might impact societal norms or security perceptions.
- Consider existing public attitudes towards private consensual sexual conduct and how legal validation could shift perceptions or reduce stigma.
Simulated Interviews
Software Developer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think it's essential that our rights to privacy and consensual actions are recognized.
- This bill should help reduce stigma and discrimination.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Business Analyst (Dallas, TX)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Laws should reflect modern society’s norms around consensual adult relationships.
- This policy provides a safety net legally, though I hadn't worried much about it.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Elementary School Teacher (Montgomery, AL)
Age: 48 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although it doesn't directly affect me, having clear legal guidelines helps foster understanding and protection for those who need it.
- Everyone should have their rights protected without interference.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Retiree (New York, NY)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have always viewed private conduct laws as inherently unjust.
- Legal clarity is crucial, though I'm no longer directly impacted.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Activist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a significant step for legal equality and justice for all adults.
- Prevention of discrimination through explicit legal recognition is key.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 3 |
College Student (Miami, FL)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Legal protections are always important, though my daily life may not see much immediate change.
- It feels reassuring to know rights are being acknowledged at the legislative level.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Farmer (Lincoln, NE)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm unsure how much it changes non-metropolitan areas, but it seems beneficial for society.
- Legal backing often means more discussions about rights and understanding.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Nurse (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is more about reinforcing existing behaviors than changing them.
- Our privacy in personal matters should always be respected and protected.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Software Engineer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 31 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel secure in my personal relationships, but formalizing protections reassures many others.
- The act may trigger more people to see privacy rights as fundamental.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Lawyer (Boston, MA)
Age: 43 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I often see cases where exaggerated legal frameworks lead to issues for normal conduct.
- This is a positive shift for aligning rights with contemporary values.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $0 (Low: $0, High: $10000000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $5000000)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $2000000)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $1000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $500000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $100000)
Key Considerations
- This policy supports civil rights without major federal budget implications.
- Long-term implications could strengthen legal consistency, though costs of litigation might shift from federal to state responsibilities.