Bill Overview
Title: Clean Energy Demonstration Transparency Act of 2022
Description: This bill directs the Department of Energy to submit semiannual reports on the status of certain clean energy demonstration projects.
Sponsors: Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]
Target Audience
Population: people affected by energy policy changes
Estimated Size: 333000000
- The bill requires the Department of Energy to report on clean energy projects, which suggests it impacts individuals involved in the energy sector.
- Clean energy projects typically involve several stakeholders, including project developers, local communities, and consumers of energy.
- Such projects often aim to replace non-renewable energy sources, which could affect workers in traditional energy sectors.
- There may be broader implications for consumers due to potential changes in energy prices or availability as these demonstration projects progress.
- Environmental and climate-focused groups would be interested in the outcomes of these projects.
Reasoning
- The policy impacts mainly individuals engaged with or influenced by clean energy demonstration projects, directly or indirectly.
- Those in the energy sector, environmental advocates, and local communities could see changes due to increased transparency and project developments.
- Budget constraints limit the policy to reporting impacts; direct project expansion or community outreaches aren't immediately supported by this policy.
- The policy primarily changes information flow rather than providing direct financial resources to affected individuals.
- Given the nature of clean energy projects, workers in fossil fuels might be indirectly impacted, although this policy itself isn't directly threatening their jobs.
- Improved reporting may influence future policy decisions further affecting a broader population.
- Economic benefits might be delayed due to slow changes in infrastructure influenced by information rather than immediate financial input.
- Attention from environmental organizations may increase due to better informational transparency.
- Communities that house these projects might experience indirect effects, such as increased media attention, public discourse, or future project developments.
Simulated Interviews
Petroleum engineer (Houston, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I view these policies with some skepticism as they seem more symbolic than actionable.
- If these reports show a push towards clean energy, it could threaten my job security.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 6 |
Renewable energy consultant (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased reporting helps us track progress and adjust strategies more effectively.
- This transparency can lead to more informed decision-making for my clients.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Retired coal miner (Appalachia, WV)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These developments might provide new job opportunities but not soon enough for our community's immediate needs.
- Transparency might make people more aware of the issues with coal.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 4 |
Environmental activist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 27 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy adds a layer of accountability, which we greatly need.
- I'm eager to see the data these reports will produce.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Public policy analyst (Seattle, WA)
Age: 50 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These reports will be critical for shaping robust future policies.
- Increased knowledge always leads to better policy-making.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
College student, majoring in Environmental Science (Portland, ME)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having access to more detailed reports from the DOE helps shape my studies and expectations for future work.
- I feel optimistic that such transparency will lead to change.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 6 |
Small business owner (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These reports may help keep clean energy competitive.
- I hope the increased transparency influences more supportive regulations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Farmer (Bismarck, ND)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If improving energy transparency leads to better energy practices, it could help farmers in the long run.
- More current issues take priority, but I support the idea.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Construction worker (Miami, FL)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't see much difference for my job in the immediate term.
- I'm more concerned with day-to-day expenses than policy reports.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Finance manager (New York, NY)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More data means better strategies and potentially profitable investments.
- These policies support our mission, but fiscal results will tell the real story.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Key Considerations
- The transparency promoted by the bill might augment private sector readiness to invest in clean energy, leveraging additional economic activities.
- Reports could unveil bottlenecks or inefficiencies in demonstration projects, leading to eventual cost savings or improved policy frameworks.