Bill Overview
Title: Homeland Security Cyber Incident Response Roles and Responsibilities Act of 2022
Description: This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to report on its roles and responsibilities, as well as those of its components, for responding to cyber incidents. DHS must coordinate with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency on the report.
Sponsors: Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals reliant on digital infrastructure globally
Estimated Size: 298000000
- The bill involves the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and specifically the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), aiming to clarify roles and responsibilities related to cyber incidents.
- Cyber incidents can impact a wide range of individuals, including those who use digital services, data networks, and online platforms.
- All sectors of society could potentially be affected by cyber incidents, from individuals to businesses to government entities, due to the interconnected nature of modern digital infrastructure.
- The global population is increasingly becoming dependent on digital services, thus making any policies related to cyber security potentially impactful on a global scale.
Reasoning
- The policy is specific to addressing cyber incidents which can affect anyone engaged with digital infrastructure. Most adults in the USA fit within the target demographic due to high internet usage.
- Budgetary constraints suggest that the policy may prioritize high-impact targets such as critical infrastructure and essential services.
- Cybersecurity policies primarily affect those in industries targeted by attacks or who manage digital infrastructures, but can also influence general public trust in digital systems.
- The potential impact on individuals can vary; some may feel more secure while others find the policy to have negligible direct impact on their lives.
Simulated Interviews
Software Developer (Silicon Valley, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone working in tech, I understand the importance of cybersecurity.
- This policy could streamline our response to cyber threats, which is crucial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Financial Analyst (New York, NY)
Age: 47 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy makes me feel that there is a better safety net for data breaches.
- It seems like a step in the right direction for data protection compliance.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Data Scientist (Seattle, WA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While important, the policy directly impacts more on my company's operations than on my personal life.
- I'm optimistic that clearer roles will lead to better incident management.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Healthcare Administrator (Austin, TX)
Age: 54 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Enhancing cybersecurity in healthcare is crucial.
- Hopefully, this policy will lead to fewer disruptions in patient care due to cyber incidents.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Small Business Owner (Chicago, IL)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't see an immediate impact, since I'm not directly interacting with DHS or CISA.
- It's good to know that there are clearer frameworks for when incidents happen.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Government Employee (Washington, DC)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy directly affects my work, ensuring we have robust incident response protocols.
- It feels like a pivotal move in integrating cyber incident management into broader security discussions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Freelance Graphic Designer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I rely on reliable internet and digital tools, but I'm not sure how much this affects me directly.
- It's comforting to know efforts are being made to protect our digital playground.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Logistics Manager (Miami, FL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Cybersecurity is critical in logistics to prevent system disruptions.
- Clarifying these roles could indirectly benefit our resilience against attacks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Retired (Boston, MA)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I like knowing there's a plan to handle cyber threats.
- Even in retirement, I value secure online activities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Student (Denver, CO)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a future professional in tech, I think this initiative is necessary.
- Understanding the roles and responsibilities early can guide better industry practices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Key Considerations
- The effectiveness of this act in achieving its objectives heavily relies on efficient implementation and inter-agency cooperation.
- Given the fast-evolving nature of cyber threats, regular updates to roles and responsibilities might be required.
- Potential overlap with existing cybersecurity measures could necessitate additional adjustments.