Bill Overview
Title: Continuing Appropriations and Health Extenders Act of 2022
Description: This bill provides continuing FY2023 appropriations to federal agencies through February 3, 2023. It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and prevents a government shutdown that would otherwise occur if the FY2023 appropriations bills have not been enacted when the existing CR expires on December 16, 2022. The bill also extends several expiring programs and authorities, including several health programs.
Sponsors: Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals relying on U.S. federal government programs
Estimated Size: 300000000
- The bill ensures the uninterrupted operation of federal agencies, impacting millions of federal employees, contractors, and those who rely on federal services.
- Continuing resolutions prevent disruptions in various federally funded programs, including healthcare, defense, and education, affecting millions of people who benefit from these services.
- The extension of health programs suggests a direct impact on individuals who utilize these specific services, potentially numbering in the millions globally.
- The bill indirectly impacts U.S. allies and partners by maintaining a stable U.S. government operation.
Reasoning
- The target population is broad, including federal employees, those enrolled in government healthcare programs, and others reliant on federal stability.
- Given the constraints, the policy can only directly offer significant benefits to a limited number due to budget limitations.
- The policy's impact might be more routine operation and relief from uncertainty rather than dramatic changes in wellbeing.
- Most individuals will experience indirect and low to moderate impact since the core function is to prevent disruption rather than enhancing services.
Simulated Interviews
Federal Employee (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A continuing resolution is critical for my job stability.
- This policy gives me short-term relief, but I wish for a more permanent solution.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retiree (Florida)
Age: 65 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.2 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring continued funding is critical for my healthcare.
- It’s reassuring that my coverage won’t be interrupted in the short term.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Healthcare worker (California)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continued funding is essential for my job and patients.
- The uncertainty from temporary measures can be stressful.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Veteran (Texas)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.3 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy gives me a sense of relief knowing VA services are stable for now.
- I hope for a more secure solution in the long term.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Graduate Student (New York)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.2 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy eases my worries about financial aid disruptions.
- I hope for lasting funding resolutions to my patience.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Contractor (Colorado)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- CRM is a critical issue for job security in my field.
- The continuous appropriations give temporary relief.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Teacher (Minnesota)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.2 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy ensures continuity in education funding, which is reassuring.
- I am hopeful for lasting solutions beyond periodic CRs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Arizona)
Age: 61 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.3 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy gives temporary peace of mind concerning contracts.
- I hope for more stable long-term policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Community Health Worker (Ohio)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy continuation prevents disruptions in essential health services.
- I wish for more stable funding structures.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Researcher (Boston)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is essential for continuous research funding.
- I wish for more secure long-term funding solutions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1100000000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The bill primarily maintains existing fiscal conditions rather than implementing new spending projects.
- Potential delays in funding decisions might lead to inefficiencies in longer-term planning for federal agencies.
- Stability induced by the bill supports national security by preventing operational disruptions.