Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9480

Bill Overview

Title: San Juan Southern Paiute Tribal Homelands Act of 2022

Description: This bill approves, ratifies, and confirms a specified treaty entered into by the Navajo Nation and the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe, thus settling land claims and other disputes. It also proclaims approximately 5,400 acres of land as the San Juan Southern Paiute Reservation to be held in trust as a reservation for the exclusive benefit of the tribe.

Sponsors: Rep. O'Halleran, Tom [D-AZ-1]

Target Audience

Population: San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe members

Estimated Size: 300

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tribal Council Member (Tuba City, Arizona)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy has been a long time coming. It's a relief to have our land recognized and secured. It means better futures for our children.
  • There will be challenges in managing the land, but this is a historic win for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 10 5
Year 20 9 5

Construction Worker (Flagstaff, Arizona)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad the disputes are settled. This could lead to new construction projects and jobs in the area.
  • It's always good to see our tribal neighbors getting justice.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Entrepreneur (Kayenta, Arizona)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This land policy will help my business grow as it'll lead to more economic activities and stability.
  • I'm excited for increased tourism and more exposure for our culture.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired Professor (Salt Lake City, Utah)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a relief to see the tribes getting the recognition and rights they deserve.
  • This is an opportunity to improve educational outcomes for the tribe's youth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

Policy Analyst (Albuquerque, New Mexico)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act is a significant legal and cultural milestone.
  • It could serve as a model for resolving other tribal land disputes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

College Student (Farmington, New Mexico)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy gives me hope for my future career in tribal law.
  • It's encouraging to see progress in such disputes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Journalist (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will provide me more stories to cover and educate the public about Native issues.
  • It's an opportunity to highlight the culture and challenges of the Paiute tribe.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Healthcare Worker (San Juan County, Utah)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could improve health conditions by stabilizing living situations.
  • I'm hopeful it'll lead to better healthcare funding and services to these remote areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Rancher (Nevada)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might lead to stronger relationships and understanding between land holders.
  • I'm concerned about any potential restrictions or changes in land management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Activist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This legislation is a victory for indigenous rights activists like myself.
  • It sets an inspiring example for peaceful resolutions and empowerment of Native communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)

Key Considerations