Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9453

Bill Overview

Title: Coral Reef Sustainability Through Innovation Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes the federal agencies on the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force, which includes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to carry out prize competitions that promote coral reef research and conservation. The prize competitions must be designed to help the United States achieve its goal of developing new and effective ways to advance the understanding, monitoring, and sustainability of coral reef ecosystems. Priority is given to establish programs that address communities, environments, or industries that are in distress due to the decline or degradation of coral reef ecosystems.

Sponsors: Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals depending on coral reef ecosystems

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tourism Operator (Florida)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could bring innovative ways to protect reefs, which is essential for my business.
  • I'm hopeful that prize competitions will inspire solutions that help preserve coral reefs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 10 4
Year 20 10 3

Marine Biologist (Hawaii)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns with my research interests and provides opportunities for groundbreaking work.
  • I expect an increase in funding for research projects here in Hawaii.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 10 8
Year 5 10 7
Year 10 10 6
Year 20 10 5

Commercial Fisher (Alaska)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Coral reef degradation affects fish populations, impacting my livelihood.
  • I hope this policy leads to innovations that reverse fish stock declines.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

Engineer (Texas)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a recreational diver, I've seen reefs deteriorate; it's disheartening.
  • It's good to see the government investing in reef conservation; it might make diving more sustainable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Retired (Puerto Rico)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've dedicated my life to environmental advocacy; this policy is a step in the right direction.
  • I hope these efforts will save our coastal ecosystems for future generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Entrepreneur (California)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Innovation drives my business; I'm glad the government is encouraging it for coral protection.
  • With more competitions, I might discover better methods for sustainable coral farming.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 10 4

Activist (New York)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy highlights the importance of collaborative innovation in tackling climate challenges.
  • It could set a precedent for addressing other marine issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Hotel Manager (U.S. Virgin Islands)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Coral health is crucial for tourists; this policy might stabilize or increase visitor numbers.
  • Positive innovations could revitalize the local economy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 4
Year 5 9 3
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 2

Diving Instructor (Palau)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Palau's reefs are incredibly biodiverse; preserving them is vital for my work and the community.
  • I'm optimistic about seeing effective reef preservation outcomes from this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 10 3

Student (Lousiana)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could pave the way for my future career in reef conservation.
  • I hope it leads to new research opportunities and conservation tactics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 3: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 5: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 10: $20000000 (Low: $16000000, High: $24000000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)

Key Considerations