Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9371

Bill Overview

Title: Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project Amendments Act of 2022

Description: This bill revises the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project (a water infrastructure project in New Mexico), including by extending through December 31, 2029, the deadline for constructing project facilities and allowing for additional project service areas.

Sponsors: Rep. Leger Fernandez, Teresa [D-NM-3]

Target Audience

Population: Navajo Nation, Jicarilla Apache Nation, and residents of Gallup

Estimated Size: 305000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (Gallup, NM)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new water project could alleviate the current supply issues we face, making daily life less stressful.
  • I hope it leads to lower water costs and better pressure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Rancher (Navajo Nation)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We've waited a long time for reliable water access; this project is crucial.
  • It will help sustain our livestock and improve our livelihood.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Software Developer (Albuquerque, NM)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not directly impacted by this project, but I think it's great for the communities who will benefit.
  • Water access is a fundamental issue, and it's about time it gets addressed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Healthcare Worker (Jicarilla Apache Nation)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved water supply will definitely help reduce health risks in our community.
  • Our patients will benefit greatly from cleaner, more reliable water access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 10 6

Small Business Owner (Gallup, NM)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reliable water supply is crucial for my business operations and for the community.
  • I'm optimistic but need to see results before raising my expectations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Student (Gallup, NM)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The project's focus on water sustainability aligns with what I'm studying and advocating for.
  • I hope it will set a precedent for other communities to improve infrastructure sustainably.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Retiree (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad my family in Gallup may have more reliable water access.
  • Although I'm not directly impacted, this project is a step forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Tribal Governance Advisor (Laguna Pueblo, NM)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This project has been a long time coming, and I support the progress toward better utility services for indigenous communities.
  • The extension and expansion are necessary to correct long-standing infrastructure neglect.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Human Rights Activist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a positive development for water rights and access, a key aspect of human rights.
  • It's inspiring to see legislative acknowledgment of these issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Civil Engineer (Farmington, NM)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From an engineering perspective, this project's extension is crucial for ensuring long-term quality and service reliability.
  • With adequate funding and planning, this infrastructure will meet public needs well into the future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $100000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $120000000)

Year 3: $105000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $125000000)

Year 5: $115000000 (Low: $95000000, High: $135000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations