Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9273

Bill Overview

Title: Central American Network for Democracy Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of State to establish a fellowship program to support a regional corps of civil society activists, lawyers, journalists, and investigators for regional democracy and rule of law activities in Central America.

Sponsors: Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35]

Target Audience

Population: Central American civil society activists, lawyers, journalists, and investigators

Estimated Size: 2000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Human Rights Lawyer (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is an excellent step towards strengthening democracy in Central America.
  • It will provide crucial support to those on the ground fighting for justice and could open new collaboration opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 9 8

Journalist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act could lead to improved access to sources and data from Central America, enhancing my reporting.
  • There's hope that conditions improve for journalists working in and about Central America.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

NGO Program Manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This fellowship program aligns with our goals and could provide additional resources and partnerships.
  • It reaffirms U.S. commitment to democratic values which is crucial for our programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 8 8

Corporate Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While directly unaffected, it's heartening to see legal support being extended internationally.
  • This could eventually create more robust frameworks globally, but immediate personal impact is low.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Educator (Austin, TX)

Age: 58 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this can lead to long-term educational and democratic benefits, but I don't expect direct impacts on my life.
  • It's a positive move worth supporting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could open doors for field research and internships focused on Central America's political systems.
  • I'm excited about potential learning and career-building opportunities this bill may facilitate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 8

Business Owner (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This might create more stable environments for business in Central America.
  • Indirectly, I hope this leads to better opportunities for trade.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Research Analyst (Boston, MA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy indicates potentially richer datasets for analysis, and increased networking opportunities with field activists.
  • I'm optimistic about the possibilities for enhanced actionable insights.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

University Professor (San Diego, CA)

Age: 43 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative might enrich academic resources and content for courses and research.
  • Watching for how it impacts academics involved with analyzing international policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Farmer (Rural Kansas)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see how this policy affects me personally.
  • It seems to be focused on areas and people far from my everyday life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 2: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 5: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 10: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 100: $7500000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Key Considerations