Bill Overview
Title: To authorize the location of a monument on the National Mall to commemorate and honor the women's suffrage movement and the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, and for other purposes.
Description: This bill authorizes the location of a monument on the National Mall to commemorate the women's suffrage movement and the passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.
Sponsors: Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]
Target Audience
Population: People worldwide who benefit from or are influenced by women's suffrage movements
Estimated Size: 167000000
- The monument is dedicated to the women's suffrage movement and the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote in the United States.
- Globally, women's suffrage movements have taken place in nearly every country, impacting women's rights and political participation around the world.
- The population impacted includes women who have gained the right to vote due to these movements, as well as men who are affected by the changes in political systems and family dynamics.
- Women's rights activists and historians globally may feel a connection to the recognition of the women's suffrage movement.
- Tourists visiting the National Mall will be directly impacted by the presence of a new monument, as it becomes a part of the historical and educational landscape of the area.
Reasoning
- This policy is largely symbolic and educational, with no direct economic or health benefits. Therefore, the impact on personal wellbeing will primarily relate to subjective feelings of representation, inspiration, educational value, and national pride.
- Women, particularly those passionate about women's rights and history, may feel more seen and acknowledged, which may slightly increase their subjective wellbeing.
- Common Americans may feel a sense of pride and historical connection with the new monument; however, it will not have a lasting daily impact on their personal lives.
- For most Americans, this policy will not dramatically change their Cantril wellbeing score, as it's more about communal and cultural significance than individual impacts.
- The monument's location on the National Mall implies that tourists and citizens visiting have the potential to engage with history tangibly, which could contribute positively to cultural and national identity, albeit in small increments.
Simulated Interviews
Teacher (New York, NY)
Age: 26 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel that commemorating the women's suffrage movement is long overdue.
- Having a monument will help teach future generations about the struggles and triumphs of women in history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Software Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This monument is a good step towards appreciating women's history.
- It's important for my daughters to see that history recognizes women's struggles and achievements.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Museum Curator (Washington D.C.)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is an important recognition of women's contributions to society.
- It aids in telling a more complete story of our nation's history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Entrepreneur (Houston, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's an important symbol, but doesn't directly affect my day-to-day life.
- I believe in equality and support the historical recognition of such movements.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Retired (Chicago, IL)
Age: 68 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a victory for older women who fought for decades to see these movements recognized.
- It gives me a sense of pride in what we've achieved.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
College Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It feels empowering to see such recognition during my formative years.
- This inspires me to contribute to society and pushes my ambition further.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Freelance Writer (Seattle, WA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.5 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's a crucial step for representation and raising awareness.
- However, tangible policy changes and protections matter more in daily lives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Nonprofit Manager (Indianapolis, IN)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This reinforces the importance of our mission and goals.
- Knowing there's a monument can help galvanize new support for our causes.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Construction Manager (Dallas, TX)
Age: 56 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.5 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's a historical gesture that I appreciate, but it doesn't change much for me personally.
- My interest is mild but supportive.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
High School Teacher (Miami, FL)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This can be a valuable educational tool for my students.
- Excited to fit this monument into my course curriculum.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)
Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)
Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)
Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)
Key Considerations
- While the monument serves primarily a cultural and commemorative role, it carries economic implications mainly during the construction phase.
- The long-term costs include maintenance, security, and potential updates to the site.
- No significant economic stimulation is anticipated aside from modest tourism increases.