Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9221

Bill Overview

Title: Bruce's Law

Description: This bill reauthorizes certain grants through FY2027 and sets out other activities to address drug overdoses, with a particular focus on contamination with fentanyl or other synthetic opioids. Specifically, the bill (1) reauthorizes grants that are available through the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) for community-based coalitions to address local drug crises, and (2) authorizes new grants for coalitions to implement education and prevention strategies in communities that face significant levels of drug overdoses related to fentanyl and other synthetic opioids. The ONDCP may delegate authority to execute the new grants to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Additionally, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must carry out a campaign to increase public awareness of the dangers of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, including the risks of such substances contaminating counterfeit drugs. The bill also establishes an interagency work group to coordinate and improve federal efforts to reduce and prevent overdoses caused by illegal drugs contaminated with fentanyl or other synthetic opioids. Work group members include the ONDCP, HHS, the Department of Justice, and the Department of State.

Sponsors: Rep. Trone, David J. [D-MD-6]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals using drugs or living in communities with high overdose rates

Estimated Size: 20000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Recovery Program Coordinator (Columbus, OH)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think Bruce's Law is essential. Communities like ours need more support to tackle the opioid crisis, especially with the rise of synthetic drugs.
  • Increased funding will help us expand our outreach and education programs, which are currently underfunded.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Local Business Owner (Charleston, WV)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope Bruce's Law helps reduce the drug problem here. It affects not just those directly involved but everyone in the community.
  • Safer streets mean better business, so I'm all for this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

College Student (San Diego, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increasing awareness about synthetic opioids is crucial. Many young people underestimate the risks.
  • Bruce's Law seems like a step in the right direction for better education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Farmer (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not directly affected by these issues, and I'm not sure how this policy impacts us in rural areas.
  • I suppose general drug education could be beneficial to the younger generation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Healthcare Worker (New York, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If Bruce's Law can reduce the number of overdose cases, that would relieve much stress and enable us to manage our emergency services better.
  • We need more awareness campaigns as part of this initiative.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Social Worker (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Grants from Bruce's Law will directly aid my efforts in helping those struggling with addiction.
  • More prevention strategies are always welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Such policies are crucial for communities riddled with drug issues.
  • Getting schools involved in awareness is a practical approach. Bruce's Law should support that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

App Developer (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Public awareness might make a difference for people like me who occasionally use drugs and worry about contamination.
  • Bruce's Law could provide the necessary cautionary information.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

Mother (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about teenagers' drug exposure; Bruce's Law focusing on fentanyl awareness is greatly needed.
  • Prevention starts at home but community resources strengthen our efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Chef (Dallas, TX)

Age: 46 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These drug problems haven't affected my business much, but I support actions that keep our community safe.
  • Awareness is good, but I don't see this impacting me much.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $45000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $55000000)

Year 2: $46000000 (Low: $36000000, High: $56000000)

Year 3: $47000000 (Low: $37000000, High: $57000000)

Year 5: $48000000 (Low: $38000000, High: $58000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations