Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9220

Bill Overview

Title: INFO for Reproductive Care Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to carry out a campaign to educate health care professionals (and health care professions students) about assisting patients to navigate legal issues related to abortions and other reproductive health care services.

Sponsors: Rep. Trahan, Lori [D-MA-3]

Target Audience

Population: Healthcare professionals and students learning about reproductive health legal navigation

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Obstetrician-gynecologist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy will provide necessary information that will help me better navigate complex legal concerns with my patients.
  • This campaign will hopefully reduce confusion and anxiety around the legal landscape of reproductive health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Registered Nurse (Houston, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the campaign could really clarify a lot of legal uncertainties that both the patients and we have.
  • Getting educated about these matters will make a huge difference in our practice.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Medical Student (New York, NY)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This campaign seems crucial since legal knowledge is not typically covered in our medical training.
  • I feel it will empower me to make informed decisions and advice when I start practicing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Family Doctor (Rural Kansas)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While my focus is broader than reproductive health, understanding legal frameworks could benefit my prenatal patients.
  • I welcome any resource that might help improve healthcare delivery in rural areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Planned Parenthood Counselor (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 31 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Clarification and education around legal matters would significantly alleviate stress in my job.
  • It would help ensure patients receive the most accurate information about their rights and options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Professor of Nursing (Seattle, WA)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Integrating legal education into the healthcare curriculum is necessary to prepare students for real-world challenges.
  • This policy could provide the tools needed to develop educational materials for my courses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Nursing Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Even as a student, understanding the legal framework is important as I will need it in all future practice.
  • This campaign could provide a foundation that my formal education might lack.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Midwife (Chicago, IL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An educational campaign like this is long overdue and needed to manage challenging consultations.
  • This could empower my practice by better preparing me for legal discussions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The education of healthcare workers is fundamental for informed policy compliance and patient care.
  • I will be interested to see cost-effectiveness data from this campaign.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Nurse (Boston, MA)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While retired, I appreciate efforts to equip current and future generations with the knowledge I missed in my career.
  • This policy should adapt and expand if successful to other facets of healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 2: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 3: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 5: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 10: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Key Considerations