Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9205

Bill Overview

Title: Public Health Emergency Flexibility Act of 2022

Description: This bill allows specified COVID-19 funding that was made available through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to also be used to address monkeypox. (Monkeypox is a viral disease that is endemic to parts of Africa and causes symptoms similar to, but less severe than, smallpox.)

Sponsors: Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Target Audience

Population: People at risk of infectious diseases (monkeypox and COVID-19)

Estimated Size: 100000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Registered Nurse (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think redirecting some COVID-19 resources to address monkeypox makes sense given the rising cases.
  • As a nurse, I welcome any policy that strengthens our response capabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Public Health Official (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for maintaining our readiness for emerging health threats such as monkeypox.
  • The additional funding allows us to expand our strategies and includes education and prevention.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 9 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Freelancer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I haven't paid much attention to monkeypox, but anything that addresses public health sounds beneficial.
  • I’m concerned about any outbreaks, but I trust our systems to handle them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 5

Immunocompromised Patient (Houston, TX)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies that enhance public health responses are incredibly important to people like me who are more vulnerable.
  • I'm grateful that there’s a focus beyond COVID-19.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Small Business Owner (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The pandemic taught us the value of readiness; I assume measures for emergent diseases will help everyone <i>eventually</i>, indirectly.
  • My main concern is keeping my business open.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see direct effects on my daily life from this.
  • It's good to know our emergency responses are active.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Public health preparedness is a topic we study closely; the policy seems like a smart move considering the funds are available.
  • Knowledge and preparedness can mitigate harm.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

CDC Researcher (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Utilizing existing funds would bolster monkeypox prevention strategies, vital for containment strategies.
  • It's about equipping systems with enough flexibility for various threats.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

High School Teacher (Boston, MA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think redirecting funds makes sense. Education on public health is key, and this could help support our schools too.
  • I'm hopeful for more awareness around diseases like monkeypox.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Tech Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m hopeful for systemic improvements long-term thanks to policies like these, but right now it doesn’t feel relevant to me.
  • Maybe our health apps could integrate updates on such issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $31000000, High: $72000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $32000000, High: $74000000)

Year 5: $58000000 (Low: $34000000, High: $78000000)

Year 10: $65000000 (Low: $38000000, High: $85000000)

Year 100: $90000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $120000000)

Key Considerations