Bill Overview
Title: Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Expansion and Redesignation Act
Description: This bill redesignates the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site currently located in Topeka, Kansas, as the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park. Further, the bill expands the park to include additional sites in Clarendon County, South Carolina, and establishes as affiliated areas specified sites in Farmville, Virginia; Wilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware; and the District of Columbia.
Sponsors: Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6]
Target Audience
Population: People interested in or affected by the expansion of the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park
Estimated Size: 2500000
- The bill expands the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park to include additional sites across multiple states, which suggests an impact not just in Kansas but across the expanded locations.
- The bill affects individuals interested in visiting these historical sites, including students, educators, and individuals interested in civil rights and educational history.
- The act may bring increased educational opportunities and tourism to these locations, affecting local communities economically and socially.
- Clarendon County, South Carolina; Farmville, Virginia; Wilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware; and the District of Columbia have historical significance in the history of desegregation, thus residents and visitors to these areas have vested interest in the expansion.
- The redesignation might increase awareness and educational programming around the historical significance of Brown v. Board of Education, potentially impacting educational institutions nationally.
Reasoning
- The population distribution should include local residents in the areas directly impacted by the park expansion, including Clarendon County, Farmville, Wilmington, Claymont, Hockessin, and DC.
- We should consider educators, students, and historians who might gain educational benefits from the expansion, as well as tourists interested in civil rights history.
- A portion of individuals will have no interest or awareness of this policy, demonstrating the diversity in potential wellbeing impact.
- The budget constraints suggest a focus on specific improvements at park sites, possibly education programs and infrastructure to attract visitors.
Simulated Interviews
History Teacher (Topeka, Kansas)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the park's expansion will bring more educational resources to Topeka and highlight important history.
- More students can engage with significant historical material firsthand, which will enrich their learning experience.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Park Ranger (Clarendon County, South Carolina)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park expansion will likely increase visitor numbers, which can positively impact our local economy.
- Additional sites bring recognition and gratitude for our community's role in history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Graduate Student (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Being more aware of these locations' inclusion in the park network strengthens my research resources.
- It might make my studies more comprehensive and offers field study options.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retired (Wilmington, Delaware)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The addition of Wilmington to the historical park increases my pride in local history.
- I hope it brings more attention and educational programs to our community.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Local Business Owner (Farmville, Virginia)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I expect this policy to bring more tourists, which could positively impact my business.
- I hope the expansion supports local pride in our historical significance.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
College Student (University of Delaware)
Age: 21 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The expansion might offer more opportunities for field trips and educational excursions.
- It adds resources for a richer understanding of civil rights education history, aligning with my studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Public School Teacher (Claymont, Delaware)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 12.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having our town included in the historical park network can enhance our curriculum.
- I expect new educational programs for students and community members alike.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Retiree (Hockessin, Delaware)
Age: 70 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This expansion acknowledges our town's historical significance, which pleases me.
- I hope it involves community activities that engage all ages.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Civil Rights Activist (Arlington, Virginia)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This expansion is monumental for civil rights education and advocacy.
- Focusing on these historical places enhances my capacity to educate and advocate.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Corporate Lawyer (Chicago, Illinois)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While I fully support the historical importance of this expansion, personally it’s unlikely to change much for me.
- I might visit the sites but primarily out of casual interest.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $7000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $9000000)
Year 2: $6000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $8000000)
Year 3: $5500000 (Low: $3500000, High: $7500000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 10: $4500000 (Low: $2500000, High: $6500000)
Year 100: $4000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $6000000)
Key Considerations
- Initial costs are higher due to the need to expand sites and provide critical infrastructure improvements at new sites.
- Operational costs include staffing, maintenance, and expanded educational programming.
- Secondary benefits include increased tourism which can enhance local economic development.
- Long-term educational benefits are hard to quantify financially but significant in terms of societal impact.