Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9196

Bill Overview

Title: Access to Donor Milk Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes programs and requirements to support the provision of donor milk for infants by nonprofit milk banks, including by (1) allowing Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) funding to be used towards nonprofit milk banks, (2) establishing grants to expand the emergency capacity of nonprofit milk banks, and (3) establishing a donor milk awareness program.

Sponsors: Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6]

Target Audience

Population: Infants requiring donor milk and their caregivers

Estimated Size: 35000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

NICU Nurse (New York, NY)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The provision of funds for nonprofit milk banks could improve the recovery and health outcomes of infants in NICUs.
  • As a nurse, I see firsthand how donor milk can be life-saving for some infants.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Stay-at-home mom (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having donor milk available was a relief during a stressful period.
  • Increased funding would likely make such programs more accessible for families in need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Software Developer (Austin, TX)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's great to support infants who need donor milk, though it would likely not affect us directly.
  • Important to have these programs for those in need, but I am not very informed about it beyond this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

High School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I fully support policies that help babies in need, even though we never needed donor milk.
  • Awareness programs are key to helping those in specific situations get the help they need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Pediatrician (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would likely improve early health outcomes for many infants in my care.
  • Increased emergency capacity for milk banks is crucial in high-demand situations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 10 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Full-Time Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I don't require this service, I understand its importance for infant health.
  • Policy could improve public health outcomes by supporting vulnerable infants.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Nonprofit Director (Portland, OR)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Support for milk banks is crucial in tackling disparities in healthcare access.
  • Increased funding could alleviate some of the pressing shortages and accessibility issues we face.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 7

Freelance Writer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's refreshing to see support for families in crisis, even if I didn’t need it personally.
  • Understanding that others benefit greatly from such support initiatives is comforting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired Pediatric Nurse (Boston, MA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to donor milk can directly impact the survival rates of vulnerable infants.
  • This policy reassures me that new generations will have what they need for healthy development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

College Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could improve the practices studied in my courses, especially regarding infant nutrition.
  • Long-term benefits for early childhood development are extremely valuable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $42000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $44000000, High: $64000000)

Year 5: $58000000 (Low: $47000000, High: $69000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations