Bill Overview
Title: PREPARE Act of 2022
Description: This bill directs the President to establish the Interagency Council on Extreme Weather Resilience, Preparedness, and Risk Identification and Management, which shall establish government-wide goals and provide recommendations for addressing extreme weather resilience, preparedness, and risk identification and management. Each federal agency shall submit biannually to the Office of Management and Budget and to the council a comprehensive plan that integrates consideration of extreme weather into its operations and overall mission objectives.
Sponsors: Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-8]
Target Audience
Population: People globally at risk of adverse consequences from extreme weather events
Estimated Size: 330000000
- The bill focuses on preparing for and managing risks associated with extreme weather patterns, which affects global populations due to the increasing frequency of events like hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, influenced by climate change.
- Populations in areas prone to extreme weather events will be directly impacted, as the bill aims to enhance resilience and preparedness.
- The bill involves federal agencies, meaning it directly impacts the population of the United States, but also indirectly impacts other countries as the U.S. contributes to global climate resilience strategies.
- The formation of an Interagency Council suggests a structured, comprehensive approach to managing extreme weather, which may serve as a model for other countries, thereby influencing global strategies for climate resilience.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on managing risks associated with extreme weather patterns. Hence, individuals living in areas prone to natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, or wildfires are most likely to be impacted directly by this policy.
- The budget constraints imply that prioritization of regions or communities facing the most immediate and severe threats from extreme weather would probably be necessary.
- People's wellbeing can significantly vary based on their exposure to extreme weather events, availability of infrastructure, and personal circumstances such as health, income, and occupation.
- Disparities in the impact might occur based on geographic location due to differing exposure levels to extreme weather and existing infrastructure resilience.
- The policy's effectiveness will also depend on how well federal agencies integrate the guidelines into their operations, emphasizing the importance of collaboration across various sectors.
Simulated Interviews
Emergency Services Manager (Houston, Texas)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy is a step in the right direction given the increasing intensity of hurricanes.
- Interagency collaboration will improve response times and resource allocation during emergencies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Urban Planner (New York, New York)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The integration of extreme weather considerations in federal plans is critical for future urban planning.
- Long-term investment in resilience will benefit city infrastructure greatly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Freelance Photographer (Los Angeles, California)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any policy that helps manage wildfires is important for safety and environmental preservation.
- There needs to be a focus on community-based solutions as well.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 3 |
Graduate Student in Environmental Science (Miami, Florida)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy aligns with scientific research on the need for better infrastructure on coasts.
- Government support is crucial for academic research contributions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Retired (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Age: 54 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It is vital to have structured federal strategies in place given past hurricane experiences.
- The policy should involve municipalities closely for localized decision making.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 2 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 2 |
Public Health Officer (Phoenix, Arizona)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Extreme heat waves are growing threats, and the policy is timely.
- Federal engagement in public health preparedness is essential.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 3 |
Insurance Analyst (Chicago, Illinois)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A policy that improves risk management and resilience is favorable for the insurance industry.
- There should be accurate, updated data sharing among agencies and stakeholders.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
High School Teacher (Kansas City, Missouri)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Integrating lesson plans with real-world policies like this can foster awareness and preparedness in students.
- Long-term community resilience is essential for future generations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 4 |
City Government Advisor (Seattle, Washington)
Age: 55 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Comprehensive policies like this prepare us better against unexpected weather phenomena.
- Collaboration with local governments will maximize impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Community Leader (San Juan, Puerto Rico)
Age: 67 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could significantly influence local emergency management capabilities.
- It is important for federal policies to address specific needs of island territories.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 2 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)
Year 2: $210000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $255000000)
Year 3: $215000000 (Low: $165000000, High: $260000000)
Year 5: $230000000 (Low: $180000000, High: $275000000)
Year 10: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)
Year 100: $400000000 (Low: $350000000, High: $450000000)
Key Considerations
- The policy's success heavily depends on the integration of extreme weather preparedness into agency operations.
- Cost estimates need to consider both direct implementation expenses and long-term economic benefits.
- The extent of federal agency cooperation and efficiency in plan execution will significantly influence outcomes.