Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9175

Bill Overview

Title: CREATIVE Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the National Endowment for the Arts to award grants to local art agencies, museums, or any other tax-exempt nonprofit arts organizations for (1) construction and acquisition of new arts facilities; (2) improving, repairing, or maintaining existing facilities; and (3) hiring and compensation of artists and staff members at an existing arts facility to solicit or produce productions, projects, performances, exhibitions, workshops, or programs.

Sponsors: Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Target Audience

Population: People affiliated or benefitting from nonprofit arts organizations

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Visual Artist (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could be a significant boost for local artists like myself. Increased funding could mean more resources and opportunities to showcase our work.
  • I'm hopeful for more collaborations and commissions, which can improve my financial stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 7 4

Museum Curator (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The CREATIVE Act holds potential for museums to expand and maintain their collections, which is crucial for cultural engagement.
  • It could aid in hiring more staff and implementing better art programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Public School Art Teacher (Austin, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not directly part of an art organization, collaborations through student programs could improve with better resourced local art groups.
  • This act could indirectly benefit my students through enhanced art exposure and opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Retired (Chicago, IL)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a regular attendee of art galleries, I welcome improvements in facilities and new exhibitions.
  • The enjoyment of visiting revitalized spaces is likely to enhance my leisure experiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Freelance Graphic Designer (Savannah, GA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Grants from this bill could open more volunteer and collaboration opportunities.
  • It's crucial that there's sufficient oversight to ensure funds are used effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Art Supply Store Owner (Seattle, WA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect this bill to increase demand for art supplies as new projects are funded.
  • It's a step in the right direction for promoting the arts and supporting the related economy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Graduating Art Student (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could create more job openings in arts management, which is encouraging for fresh graduates.
  • It may lead to professional growth by exposing beginners to higher quality projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 7 3

Exhibition Installation Technician (Portland, OR)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The CREATIVE Act could increase job security and workload stability by ensuring ongoing projects.
  • I'm optimistic about having access to more tools and improved facilities for installations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Community Arts Program Coordinator (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This has the potential to sustain and expand programs for community outreach and development.
  • It's essential to evaluate the program's reach and ensure equitable distribution of funds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Jazz Musician (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although primarily a performing artist, improved facilities might enhance venues and perhaps slightly increase performance opportunities.
  • The impact may depend more on how funds are allocated among different art forms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1200000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $1400000000)

Year 2: $1150000000 (Low: $950000000, High: $1350000000)

Year 3: $1100000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1300000000)

Year 5: $1000000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1250000000)

Year 10: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $150000000)

Key Considerations