Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9142

Bill Overview

Title: Elder Pride Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes the Administration on Aging to award grants to state or tribal governments or other eligible organizations (e.g., area agencies on aging and multipurpose senior centers) for providing sexual health and other services for older adults in rural areas, with a particular focus on older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex individuals.

Sponsors: Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Target Audience

Population: Older adults, particularly those identifying as LGBTQI+ in rural areas globally

Estimated Size: 8000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired farmer (Rural Ohio)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy could really help folks in my town, especially those who feel a bit isolated due to their sexual orientation.
  • I believe having more services locally would save us the long drives to the city.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Retired teacher (Rural Alabama)

Age: 74 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There's practically no support around here for women like me. This could change a lot for us.
  • Visibility and services mean the world to folks who’ve had to hide most of their lives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Former oil field worker (Rural Texas)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I haven't had someone to talk to about my orientation in my entire life.
  • If this policy can bring understanding and care to my area, it would help me... a lot.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 3

Artist (Rural Vermont)

Age: 72 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this as a potential game-changer for some of my friends.
  • Rural LGBTQ folks often get forgotten, policy like this puts us back on the map.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Retired nurse (Rural Montana)

Age: 80 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm straight, I think programs like these are necessary.
  • Access to new health resources could benefit everyone, not just LGBTQ seniors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired electrician (Rural Georgia)

Age: 66 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've kept a lot about myself hidden, even from family.
  • This policy could give me a safe outlet to receive the care needed without judgement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Retired librarian (Rural Kansas)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I struggle with acceptance here, there's little support for my situation.
  • This grant could bring critical services to an area that desperately needs them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 7 2
Year 10 8 2
Year 20 7 2

Retired post officer (Rural Minnesota)

Age: 76 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's heartening to see times change; help keeps getting closer to home.
  • My generation's journey hasn't been easy; support means everything.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Homemaker (Rural South Carolina)

Age: 78 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Isolation is a daily battle; anything that bridges gaps in our rural healthcare is a blessing.
  • I'm hoping this policy can make a difference and maybe offer more end-of-life care.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Retired homemaker (Rural Colorado)

Age: 79 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Makes me happy to see my LGBTQ friends have more local resources.
  • General improvements in healthcare access could help people like me too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $90000000)

Year 2: $70000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $85000000)

Year 3: $70000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $85000000)

Year 5: $65000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $80000000)

Year 10: $60000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $75000000)

Year 100: $40000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $50000000)

Key Considerations