Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9070

Bill Overview

Title: National Museum of American LGBTQ+ History and Culture Act

Description: This bill establishes within the Smithsonian Institution the National Museum of American LGBTQ+ History and Culture. The museum (1) may carry out educational and liaison programs in support of its goals, and (2) shall establish specified grant and scholarship programs.

Sponsors: Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]

Target Audience

Population: People interested in LGBTQ+ history and culture

Estimated Size: 30000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Graphic Designer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think having a museum dedicated to American LGBTQ+ history is great. It would mean a lot to the community and help educate others.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

History Professor (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This museum will be invaluable for access to resources and for enhancing the visibility of LGBTQ+ history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Museum Curator (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The museum will set a precedent for inclusivity and acknowledgment of LGBTQ+ contributions to history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

College Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A museum with scholarships and grants will be a huge support for students like me pursuing related studies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

High School Teacher (New York, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This museum can provide an excellent resource for educators and motivate more inclusive history education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

LGBTQ+ Rights Activist (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Establishing the museum is a positive step for representation and could help in various activism efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Retired (Dallas, TX)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having this museum is important to acknowledge our history, but I wonder if it will reach more conservative areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Journalist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This institution will create more avenues for dialogue and open up coverage for more stories and events.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 9 8

Tour Guide (Las Vegas, NV)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This museum will certainly be a new attraction, generating interest and potentially more business for tour guides.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 6

Filmmaker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The resources and visibility stemming from this museum could enhance storytelling and awareness through film.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $70000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $90000000)

Year 2: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 3: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 10: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 100: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Key Considerations