Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/9059

Bill Overview

Title: Non-Recognition of Russian Annexation of Ukrainian Territory Act

Description: This bill prohibits any federal agency from taking any action or extending any assistance that recognizes or implies recognition of Russia's sovereignty over any internationally recognized territory of Ukraine, including its airspace and territorial waters.

Sponsors: Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals living in Ukraine

Estimated Size: 70000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Government Official (Washington D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy strengthens our commitment to international law and supports Ukraine in its sovereignty issues.
  • It's crucial for our foreign policy to be clear about our stance on territorial disputes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

International Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy denotes a principled stance on international law, which aligns with international human rights norms.
  • It could potentially affect diplomatic missions I am involved with, in a positive way.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Business Owner (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about how this might affect my business with clients in Eastern Europe.
  • While it's important to stand for international law, I worry about potential impacts on trade relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired (Austin, TX)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a step in the right direction for global diplomatic integrity.
  • I'm supportive but concerned about its long-term impact on U.S.-Russia relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Graduate Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's great to see policies that reinforce international norms, but I'm skeptical about actual impacts.
  • This policy could reshape some aspects of my studies on U.S.-Russia relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Tech Professional (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is comforting, knowing the U.S. supports Ukraine’s sovereignty.
  • I am worried about how this might change the travel advisories and my ability to visit family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Media Analyst (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could stir debates and lead to shifts in international reporting and focus.
  • I'm interested to see how this impacts coverage and perception.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This may reassure some investors, maintaining confidence in Ukraine's legitimate governance.
  • However, there's still anxiety over stability and security in investments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Historian (Boston, MA)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Recognizing sovereignty issues is crucial for maintaining historical accuracy and principles of international relations.
  • This aligns with historical precedents and could serve as a teaching point for the importance of sovereignty.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy is necessary for holding on to international law norms.
  • It will be interesting to observe any shifts in global alliances or counteractions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Year 2: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Year 3: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Year 5: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $750000)

Key Considerations