Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8989

Bill Overview

Title: Buy Low and Sell High Act

Description: This bill revises requirements concerning the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), establishes an Economic Petroleum Reserve, creates a national network of Strategic Refined Petroleum Product Reserves, increases the size of the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve, limits the sale and exportation of petroleum products, and sets forth provisions to reduce the demand for petroleum fuel and increase fuel supply. Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish within the SPR an Economic Petroleum Reserve of up to 350 million barrels of crude oil. DOE may acquire crude oil from domestic producers at low prices and then sell the oil when the prices are high as specified by the bill. DOE must also establish a national network of Strategic Refined Petroleum Product Reserves to store up to 250 million barrels of gasoline and diesel fuel, which may be sold when there is a severe fuel supply interruption within the district in which the reserve is located. In addition, the bill increases the cap on the amount of barrels of petroleum distillate that may be stored in the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve from two million to four million. It also establishes limits on the sale and exportation of petroleum products from such reserves. For example, the bill prohibits the sale or export of fuel from the reserves to (1) China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran; (2) any other country under U.S. sanctions; or (3) any entity owned, controlled, or influenced by one of those countries or the Chinese Communist Party. However, DOE may issue a waiver of the prohibition if it is in the national security interests of the United States to allow such a sale or export. Finally, the bill establishes requirements and incentives to reduce fuel demand and increase fuel supply, including by (1) providing financial assistance for projects to electrify the transportation sector, (2) setting requirements concerning the minimum percentage of federal vehicles that must be zero-emission vehicles, and (3) directing DOE to establish a program to increase the amount of crude oil refined in oil refineries in certain countries in the Western Hemisphere.

Sponsors: Rep. Pallone, Frank, Jr. [D-NJ-6]

Target Audience

Population: People dependent on or involved in the petroleum industry and energy consumption sectors

Estimated Size: 100000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Oil Refinery Engineer (Houston, Texas)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm a bit worried that focusing too much on increasing refining in other countries might affect my job here.
  • However, stabilizing domestic oil prices could benefit the U.S. market.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Home Heating Oil Distributor (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increase in the Northeast reserve should help buffer against price spikes, which is a relief during the winter months.
  • I am hopeful that this will also help my business be more stable year-round.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 6

Electric Vehicle Startup CEO (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy's support for electrification could significantly boost business growth and innovation.
  • I'm excited about the possibilities, though competition will surely increase.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Retired Coal Miner (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more strategic reserves seems like a good idea, but it doesn't address my options shifting away from traditional energy use.
  • I'm worried long-term about costs going up as we shift away from oil.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Financial Analyst (New York City, New York)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Export restrictions could unsettle global markets, impacting more than just our trade with sanctioned countries.
  • Balancing domestic stability with international trade is crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Petroleum Engineer (New Orleans, Louisiana)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The strategy might offer more predictable demand for domestic oil, which is positive for my field.
  • However, price manipulations can be tricky and affect planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Urban Planner (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Incentives to reduce fuel demand align well with urban sustainability goals.
  • Transition to electrified transport can greatly aid public health and economy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Auto Mechanic (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With a push for more electric cars, I might need to shift my skills.
  • It’s a bit daunting, but policies show the direction we're heading.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, California)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm thrilled by the potential opportunities policy-driven market shifts can bring to the tech industry.
  • Given the growing emphasis on efficiency, my business stands to gain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 10 9
Year 3 10 9
Year 5 10 9
Year 10 10 9
Year 20 10 9

Politician (Dallas, Texas)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems well-rounded and should stabilize our domestic markets.
  • Maintaining U.S. energy independence is crucial for our national security.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $2000000000)

Year 2: $1400000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 3: $1300000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1750000000)

Year 5: $1200000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1600000000)

Year 10: $1100000000 (Low: $750000000, High: $1500000000)

Year 100: $900000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $1200000000)

Key Considerations