Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8985

Bill Overview

Title: Credit Access and Inclusion Act of 2022

Description: This bill allows for the reporting of certain positive consumer-credit information to consumer reporting agencies. Specifically, a person or the Department of Housing and Urban Development may report information related to a consumer's performance in making payments either under a lease agreement for a dwelling or pursuant to a contract for a utility or telecommunications service. However, information about a consumer's usage of any utility or telecommunications service may be reported only to the extent that the information relates to payment by the consumer for such service or other terms of the provision of that service. Furthermore, an energy-utility firm may not report a consumer's outstanding balance as late if the firm and the consumer have entered into a payment plan and the consumer is meeting the obligations of that plan. Specified provisions that establish civil liability with respect to furnishers of information to consumer reporting agencies shall not apply to any violation of the bill. The Government Accountability Office must report on the consumer impact of such reporting.

Sponsors: Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

Target Audience

Population: People utilizing credit reports featuring rental, utility, or telecommunications payment data

Estimated Size: 250000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Administrative Assistant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I always pay my rent and utilities on time, but it hasn't really helped my credit score. This policy might finally recognize my consistent payments.
  • It would be a relief if my utility payments improved my credit; maybe I could qualify for better loan terms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Freelancer (Houston, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's fair that my utility payments contribute to my credit score.
  • I've had some struggles getting loans even with a solid track record of paying bills. This could help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have a good credit score and don't anticipate this policy will affect me much.
  • It seems more beneficial for younger folks or those trying to build their credit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 8 8

Small Business Owner (New York, NY)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good in principle, but I don't think it affects me directly since most of my payments are business-related.
  • My personal credit is already strong.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If my rent payments can help me build credit, that's fantastic!
  • I'm planning to apply for student loans, and improving my credit would be a huge help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Utility Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a progressive step to recognize utilities in credit scores.
  • Not everyone owns a home to benefit from traditional credit-building methods.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Warehouse Worker (Buffalo, NY)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having my utility payments reported might finally give me a chance to establish a credit score.
  • I can't even get a credit card with no score. This could change things.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 4

Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My credit is stable already. I can't see this policy significantly affecting me.
  • It seems more beneficial for people who rent or young adults starting out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Service Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 19/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reporting rent payments could assist my financial independence and credit building.
  • I feel like it would help young people establish themselves financially.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Accountant (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is certainly helpful for others but doesn't change much for me with an already robust credit history.
  • More inclusive credit reporting could strengthen the financial system overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $20000000 (Low: $17500000, High: $25000000)

Year 3: $17500000 (Low: $15000000, High: $20000000)

Year 5: $15000000 (Low: $12500000, High: $18000000)

Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $13000000)

Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)

Key Considerations