Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8984

Bill Overview

Title: Medical Care Equity Act

Description: This bill allows a tax deduction for the unreimbursed Medicare-based value of qualified charity care (i.e., physicians' services furnished without expectation of reimbursement, including medical screenings and treatment for emergency medical conditions and labor-related treatments). The bill also specifies that a physician is not liable under federal or state law for harm caused by an act or omission of the physician, or attending medical personnel supporting the physician, if the act or omission (1) occurs in the course of furnishing charity care, and (2) was not grossly negligent. The bill preempts laws of a state or locality that are inconsistent with this exemption, unless the laws provide greater protection from liability for a defendant.

Sponsors: Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Target Audience

Population: People involved in providing and receiving charity care

Estimated Size: 31000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Emergency Room Doctor (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might encourage more physicians like me to engage in charity care, knowing there's a tax deduction and limited legal liabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Uninsured Construction Worker (Kansas City, MO)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If more doctors are willing to offer charity care, I might finally get some of my health issues addressed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Hospital Administrator (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reducing potential lawsuits is a big win. We might expand our charity care programs as a result.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Veteran (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's comforting to know that the folks helping me are also getting something back for their trouble. I might worry less about my next medical emergency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Pediatrician (Seattle, WA)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Getting a tax break for what I was already doing is a nice bonus. It makes offering free care more sustainable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Nurse Practitioner (Rural Tennessee)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fewer worries about gettin' sued will make it easier to keep seeing uninsured folks without losing sleep over it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Engineer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Doesn't really affect me, but I'm glad doctors who help the less fortunate will be getting some help too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Health Policy Analyst (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act is a step in the right direction to increase healthcare access, though its reach may be limited without additional funding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Uninsured Part-time Worker (Miami, FL)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If more hospitals offer free care, I might finally see a doctor without fear of bills.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Lawyer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 49 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reducing liability for charity care is a double-edged sword; it's good for encouraging charity work but may reduce protection for patients.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $7000000000)

Year 2: $5050000000 (Low: $3030000000, High: $7070000000)

Year 3: $5100500000 (Low: $3060300000, High: $7140700000)

Year 5: $5202025000 (Low: $3121803000, High: $7274707000)

Year 10: $5522761500 (Low: $3314382330, High: $7714928900)

Year 100: $8910055630 (Low: $5346033378, High: $12477077882)

Key Considerations