Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8982

Bill Overview

Title: Bulk Infant Formula to Retail Shelves Act

Description: This act provides through December 31, 2022, duty-free treatment to certain infant formula base powder used in the manufacturing of infant formula in the United States, subject to quantity limitations. Infant formula base powder means a dry mixture of protein, fat, and carbohydrates that requires only the addition of vitamins and minerals in order to meet the definition of the term infant formula in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. During this time period, articles of infant formula base powder shall not be subject to any additional safeguard duties that may be imposed under subchapter IV of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

Sponsors: Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]

Target Audience

Population: Formula-fed infants globally and their caregivers

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Primary caregiver (New York, NY)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm constantly seeking ways to save on baby formula as it's a big part of my expenses.
  • Duty-free formula base seems like it could reduce prices temporarily, which is a relief.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Infant formula manufacturer employee (Dallas, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Lower import duties mean potentially more job security as our company might expand or at least sustain production.
  • It indirectly affects my job stability, though I doubt it changes my salary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Retail store manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Changes in formula supply and cost could make my job easier as customers might complain less about prices.
  • I might personally benefit too, as I'm pregnant and considering using formula.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Milk powder supplier (Chicago, IL)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Competition might increase with foreign base powders coming in cheaper.
  • I may need to adjust my business strategy but it's a short window of change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 4 5
Year 10 4 5
Year 20 4 5

Pediatrician (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If formula becomes more affordable, it would relieve some of the burden on new parents.
  • I don't see it drastically changing medical recommendations, but could ease some access issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Economist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Economically, removing duties makes sense to counteract supply chain issues temporarily.
  • Personally unaffected, but can see the broader benefits for industry efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

College student (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.2 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I wouldn't have been affected directly since I'm not purchasing formula.
  • It's interesting from an economic policy perspective though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Formula exporter (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy doesn't directly affect exports, but could influence competitors' prices domestically.
  • I worry about temporary price distortions in the market.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Community health worker (Boston, MA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.5 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A drop in formula cost could really help the families I work with, hopefully it also continues beyond 2022.
  • Short-term relief is better than none.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Retired (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.1 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Interesting policy for its economic and international trade implications, but it doesn't affect me personally.
  • I appreciate the insights into governmental economic strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $7000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations