Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8979

Bill Overview

Title: Behavioral Health Crisis Care Centers Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish a grant program for states, Indian tribes, territories, and localities to support one-stop crisis facilities. These are facilities that provide behavioral health, substance use disorder, and housing services at a single location, as well as coordinate with other services available in the community.

Sponsors: Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9]

Target Audience

Population: People experiencing behavioral health crises

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Freelance Graphic Designer (New York City, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new policy could provide easier access to crisis care when I need it.
  • Having everything in one place would be less stressful than coordinating multiple appointments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Construction Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might help me find support for both my addiction and getting a roof over my head.
  • I hope the facility staff are understanding and not judgmental.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 2

Barista (Chicago, IL)

Age: 33 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It would be great to have immediate access to mental health professionals when I’m facing a crisis.
  • I worry about the availability of such facilities in high-demand areas like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Retired (Rural Iowa)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 2

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't currently have local access to such help. If these services were nearby, it could change things for me.
  • Transportation is a challenge for me still, so I hope they offer some help with that as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 3 2
Year 2 4 2
Year 3 5 2
Year 5 5 1
Year 10 6 1
Year 20 5 1

Software Developer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it’s a great initiative but I have private insurance coverage already.
  • It might make it easier for friends I know who need these services but can't afford them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 6

Social Worker (Miami, FL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this policy as a much-needed support improvement for the communities I serve.
  • Coordination with existing services will be critical for its success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

College Professor (Boston, MA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy seems well-intentioned, but I don't think it will impact me significantly aside from possibly influencing the community at large.
  • Hope it gets the resources it needs to be effective for those who really need it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Unemployed (Seattle, WA)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy will make getting to mental health appointments easier and faster.
  • These one-stop centers might reduce the stress of navigating different systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 2

Business Owner (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m concerned whether facilities like these can handle people in recovery like me.
  • With the right staff, it could provide much needed support for those relapsing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 6

Student (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s helpful to have these services but my main treatment comes from my university.
  • Many students like me could benefit, especially when university resources are limited.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 3: $520000000 (Low: $410000000, High: $620000000)

Year 5: $540000000 (Low: $430000000, High: $640000000)

Year 10: $600000000 (Low: $480000000, High: $720000000)

Year 100: $800000000 (Low: $640000000, High: $960000000)

Key Considerations