Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8948

Bill Overview

Title: Runaway and Homeless Youth and Trafficking Prevention Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2027 and expands programs for runaway, homeless, and disconnected youth, including resources and services to support youth victims of human trafficking and youth at risk of being trafficked.

Sponsors: Rep. Yarmuth, John A. [D-KY-3]

Target Audience

Population: Runaway, homeless, and disconnected youth, including those at risk of trafficking globally

Estimated Size: 4200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Student (New York, NY)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy sounds promising because it's really hard to find help when you're a kid.
  • Sometimes I feel like there are no options, so extra support would be amazing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Unemployed (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any program that helps kids like me get permanent housing sounds good.
  • I really need stable housing so I can focus on getting a job.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 6

Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 15 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 2

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could help me find a safe place to stay and someone to talk to.
  • I hope they'll focus on making places that are actually safe and understanding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 3 2
Year 2 4 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Part-time barista (Seattle, WA)

Age: 21 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think expanded services can help a lot of people in the same situation I was.
  • If these programs include job training or counseling, that would be incredibly useful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 16 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Programs that offer safe housing and understand LGBTQ+ issues are greatly needed.
  • It's hard to feel hopeful about my future, but knowing someone's advocating for us helps.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Full-time job seeker (Miami, FL)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Support systems tailored for trafficking survivors can significantly impact my ability to rebuild my life.
  • I hope such policies carry long-term support plans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 7

Agricultural worker (Rural areas, Kansas)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The focus on rural areas might get overlooked, but they're needed.
  • Such policies must include rural-specific outreach and transportation assistance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

High School Graduate (Boston, MA)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Eviction is a huge worry, so housing support would make a big difference.
  • I worry these funds won't reach kids like me before it's too late.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 6

Media intern (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 20 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies that address both housing and mental health will be life-changing.
  • I hope these programs are easy to access and provide immediate support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Construction Apprentice (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope the policy includes mentoring and support to help me continue growing professionally.
  • Stability came after a long struggle, and outreach programs need to reach people before they lose hope.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $750000000 (Low: $650000000, High: $850000000)

Year 2: $775000000 (Low: $675000000, High: $875000000)

Year 3: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 5: $850000000 (Low: $750000000, High: $950000000)

Year 10: $950000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1050000000)

Year 100: $1500000000 (Low: $1250000000, High: $1750000000)

Key Considerations