Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8937

Bill Overview

Title: Restoring Accountability in the Indian Health Service Act of 2022

Description: 2022 This bill establishes a series of programs and requirements relating to recruitment and retention in the Indian Health Service, including provisions regarding pay, credentialing, and housing needs of workforce personnel.

Sponsors: Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

Target Audience

Population: American Indians and Alaska Natives using Indian Health Service

Estimated Size: 2600000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Elementary School Teacher (Navajo Nation, Arizona)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy improves wait times at our local IHS clinic.
  • It could take hours to see a doctor, especially during flu season.
  • Better pay for the staff might help keep more doctors around.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Retired (Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma)

Age: 56 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic this bill will help reduce the burden on IHS doctors.
  • Regular check-ups are essential for managing my condition, and sometimes appointments are delayed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Healthcare Worker (Juneau, Alaska)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The housing assistance for health workers might be a game-changer for recruitment.
  • Many colleagues speak of the high cost of living and long distances traveled to work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 10 5

Artist (Sioux Falls, South Dakota)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Mental health services need more focus and staff.
  • IHS workers are doing their best, but they seem overwhelmed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Community Organizer (Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about the implementation being slow or benefits not trickling down here.
  • It’s crucial to see changes where it counts—on the ground.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Logistics Specialist (Fairbanks, Alaska)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better credentialing could streamline supplies and improve efficiency.
  • Supply chain problems add unnecessary stress to healthcare workers and patients alike.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Retired Farmer (Yakima Valley, Washington)

Age: 63 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • IHS improvements would be a boons given how understaffed clinics seem.
  • My son's job satisfaction is directly linked to adequate staffing and support resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Graduate Student (Salt Lake City, Utah)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm interested in seeing how the recruitment efforts unfold given current healthcare demands.
  • Retaining skilled professionals in remote areas is challenging but vital.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Non-profit Director (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There's a significant urban Native population that also relies on improved IHS services.
  • Budget limitations might still restrict the effectiveness of these programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Park Ranger (Taos, New Mexico)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I regularly advocate for youth health initiatives, so IHS improvements are vital.
  • Recruitment is important, but retention will show real change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $510000000 (Low: $410000000, High: $610000000)

Year 3: $520000000 (Low: $420000000, High: $620000000)

Year 5: $540000000 (Low: $440000000, High: $640000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations