Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8929

Bill Overview

Title: To designate the Cold War Museum located at 7142 Lineweaver Road, Warrenton, Virginia, as the "National Cold War Museum of the United States", and for other purposes.

Description: This bill designates the Cold War Museum located at 7142 Lineweaver Road, Warrenton, Virginia, as the National Cold War Museum of the United States.

Sponsors: Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals interested in Cold War history and museum visitors

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired Military Officer (Richmond, Virginia)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's an excellent move to designate the Cold War Museum as a national museum. It'll help preserve important history.
  • As a veteran, it feels like an acknowledgment of our service during a time less often highlighted.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

History Teacher (Arlington, Virginia)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This designation might add more educational resources to the museum, which would greatly benefit student learning.
  • Having a national museum nearby will elevate our history classes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

IT Specialist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm happy they're emphasizing this part of U.S. history, but it's unlikely to change much for someone on the west coast.
  • I might consider a visit if I'm ever on that side of the country.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Journalist (New York, New York)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Designating it as a national museum will likely spark more interest in Cold War-related articles, driving some public interest stories.
  • I see a professional advantage in this development, leading to potentially enriching coverage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cold War Historian (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could be a pivotal moment for educators and historians alike, granting access to additional resources and networks.
  • It's a significant step toward ensuring Cold War narratives are not lost.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired Diplomat (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 75 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The recognition of the museum is gratifying and may help in sustaining public discourse around the Cold War's diplomatic efforts.
  • I'm pleased to see this era getting recognition, particularly for younger generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

College Student (Houston, Texas)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this will bring considerable attention to my research interests, especially in courses focusing on 20th-century history.
  • I might plan a visit as part of a study trip.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Museum Curator (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is fantastic news; it could lead to more collaborative exhibits and sharing of artifacts between institutions.
  • Providing a national platform can strengthen community engagement across cultural institutions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Tech Entrepreneur (San Diego, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate the efforts to preserve history, though as a West Coast resident, I doubt I'll see direct benefits or impacts.
  • It's a great initiative, and I support it philosophically.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

High School History Teacher (Raleigh, North Carolina)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could enrich our curriculum and provide engaging field trips for students.
  • We may even develop a focused school event around a museum visit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 2: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)

Year 3: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)

Year 5: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)

Key Considerations