Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8893

Bill Overview

Title: To establish a pilot program on research and development of plant-based protein for the Navy, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill requires the Department of the Navy to implement a three-year pilot program to offer plant-based protein options at not fewer than two naval facilities, prioritizing facilities where livestock-based protein options may be costly to obtain or store.

Sponsors: Rep. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI-8]

Target Audience

Population: People directly and indirectly involved with the Navy's plant-based protein program

Estimated Size: 7000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Naval Officer (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's good to have more food options, especially healthy ones like plant-based proteins.
  • It could be a nice change from the typical meat-based meals we have.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Navy Dietitian (San Diego, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Implementing plant-based options will be challenging but beneficial for our dietary diversity.
  • I hope it encourages healthier eating habits among the sailors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Plant-based Protein Supplier (Seattle, WA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could bring a big boost to our business if we become a supplier.
  • It's a great opportunity for expanding plant-based diets in the military market.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 7 5

Sailor (Pensacola, FL)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad to have more meal choices especially ones that don't upset my stomach.
  • It aligns with my personal health needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Navy Cook (Groton, CT)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It'll be interesting to work with new ingredients and diversify our menu.
  • Could be challenging but ultimately rewarding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Civilian contractor (Boston, MA)

Age: 46 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see potential expansion in our contracts if we handle plant-based logistics.
  • The additional complexity might disrupt current operations initially.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Parent of Sailor (Kansas City, MO)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious to see how my son adapts to these new food choices.
  • A healthy diet is important, so this could be good for his health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Community activist (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program aligns with sustainable food practices I've advocated for.
  • I hope it sets a precedent for broader military adoption.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired Navy Veteran (Jacksonville, FL)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Programs like this can modernize and improve navy nutrition standards.
  • It's an innovative step that may benefit active duty personnel.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Environmental Scientist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns with sustainable environmental goals I'm passionate about.
  • Well-executed, it could reduce ecological footprints.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $8500000 (Low: $7500000, High: $9500000)

Year 2: $8300000 (Low: $7300000, High: $9300000)

Year 3: $8100000 (Low: $7100000, High: $9100000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations