Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8891

Bill Overview

Title: No Surprises for Survivors Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires health insurance plans to cover, with no cost sharing, medical forensic examinations for sexual assault patients.

Sponsors: Rep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38]

Target Audience

Population: People requiring medical forensic examinations for sexual assault

Estimated Size: 8000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Graduate Student (New York, NY)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy can make a huge difference for survivors like me. We already deal with so much emotionally, having one less financial worry is a relief.
  • It's crucial we're not discouraged from obtaining necessary medical examinations due to high costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will get people the help they need without them worrying about the cost. I remember my sister was too overwhelmed to think about expenses right after her incident.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Nurse (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that supports patients in crisis is vital. This policy could also streamline processes in hospitals regarding payment concerns.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Health Insurance Specialist (Houston, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could streamline many claims processes that currently require detailed negotiations and can ease the burden on survivors in understanding their benefits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Therapist (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see many clients who are distressed about adding financial worries to their trauma. This policy offers them peace of mind and encourages them to seek help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Activist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It is vital to remove barriers for anyone choosing to come forward and receive medical attention, especially in marginalized communities where such barriers can be even greater.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Survivor Advocate (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Survivors need to focus on healing, not on bills. This move is incredibly supportive and removes barriers.
  • It's also about timely care which is crucial for both health and gathering evidence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Healthcare Administrator (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill simplifies processes and helps in reducing administrative tasks related to disputes over cost-sharing.
  • Hospitals might see changes in the insurance claim approval rates as a result.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

College Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • In my own experience, worrying about money after such a traumatic event felt overwhelming. This policy will give survivors like me a chance to focus on recovery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 8 4
Year 3 9 4
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Policy Analyst (Seattle, WA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a policy perspective, this is a necessary change to ensure equity in healthcare. Removing financial barriers is a fundamental need in our healthcare system.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Year 2: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Year 3: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Year 5: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Year 10: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Year 100: $6800000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $9600000000)

Key Considerations