Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8830

Bill Overview

Title: Law Enforcement Scenario-Based Training for Safety and De-Escalation Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services within the Department of Justice to develop a scenario-based training curriculum that addresses topics such as de-escalation and use of deadly force. The bill authorizes grants for entities to provide law enforcement personnel with training that is substantially similar to the curriculum.

Sponsors: Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13]

Target Audience

Population: Law enforcement personnel and impacted communities

Estimated Size: 330800000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Law Enforcement Officer (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Additional training is always beneficial, especially in crisis situations.
  • De-escalation training could reduce stress and hesitation, likely leading to better outcomes in the field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Community Organizer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hopefully, this training will prevent unnecessary escalations in my community.
  • Trust in police might improve if we see tangible changes in behavior.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Police Officer (Dallas, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training that emphasizes de-escalation is crucial for new officers entering challenging environments.
  • Could help me feel more confident in my decision-making.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Civil Rights Lawyer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Proper de-escalation training could reduce incidents we see in court.
  • Skeptical about implementation, but it's a move in the right direction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Social Worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training like this could make police interactions less confrontational for my clients.
  • I hope to see better cooperation between police and social services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired Law Enforcement (Rural Tennessee)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think such training is overdue; it wasn't available during my time, but it's crucial now.
  • Could potentially reduce the stress and burden on officers in the field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Public Defender (Baltimore, MD)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome any change that could reduce aggressive policing tactics.
  • The effectiveness will depend heavily on the quality and consistency of training.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

College Student (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training police to de-escalate is essential for a safer society.
  • It's important for my future career that these practices become standard.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Private Security Consultant (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A training curriculum like this could decrease the number of dangerous altercations.
  • While security and policing differ, principles of de-escalation are important to both.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Activist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training is a start but must be accompanied by broader systemic changes to be truly effective.
  • The community will watch closely to see how this policy is implemented.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $4100000 (Low: $3700000, High: $4500000)

Year 2: $4100000 (Low: $3700000, High: $4500000)

Year 3: $4100000 (Low: $3700000, High: $4500000)

Year 5: $4100000 (Low: $3700000, High: $4500000)

Year 10: $4500000 (Low: $4000000, High: $5000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $4500000, High: $5500000)

Key Considerations