Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8788

Bill Overview

Title: Department of State Authorization Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes various activities of the Department of State through FY2023 and otherwise addresses matters related to the State Department.

Sponsors: Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals impacted by changes in Department of State operations

Estimated Size: 334000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I expect enhanced services at embassies might make my international travels smoother and safer.
  • Better foreign relations often mean more business opportunities for companies like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Retired Military (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More effective diplomatic actions can strengthen U.S. international standing.
  • Consular support improvements are always beneficial, especially for Americans in global crises.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Consular Officer (New York, NY)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Successful policy implementation can lead to better resources and support for consular services.
  • Improving embassy operations can directly affect my job performance and satisfaction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A higher budget usually enables better diplomatic effort and negotiation scope, enhancing national security.
  • I'm optimistic about the systemic improvements this could bring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Oil Executive (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • International diplomacy's stability impacts global oil markets, which is crucial for my business.
  • Stronger diplomatic ties often facilitate smoother international deals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Potential improvements in consular services could make my study abroad experience smoother.
  • If diplomatic relations with France improve, it might enhance my time there.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

International Relations Professor (Chicago, IL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious if the increased budget will effectively improve diplomatic staffing and initiatives globally.
  • More resources should ideally result in better public diplomacy outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Software Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhanced U.S. diplomatic presence in Asia could lead to better business opportunities and fewer bureaucratic hurdles.
  • Consular service improvements help during travel.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Journalist (Boston, MA)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • International policies determined by the State Department affect my work closely.
  • I anticipate better news flow and access with improved diplomatic engagement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Dallas, TX)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved embassy operations mean better assistance for Americans abroad, which is reassuring.
  • I'm hopeful it leads to quicker response times in emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $13250000000 (Low: $12800000000, High: $13700000000)

Year 2: $13500000000 (Low: $13020000000, High: $14000000000)

Year 3: $13800000000 (Low: $13250000000, High: $14350000000)

Year 5: $14200000000 (Low: $13600000000, High: $14900000000)

Year 10: $15000000000 (Low: $14300000000, High: $15700000000)

Year 100: $21000000000 (Low: $20000000000, High: $22000000000)

Key Considerations