Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8768

Bill Overview

Title: Fighting Cancer in Children Act

Description: This bill makes funding available for research and related activities concerning pediatric cancer that are conducted or supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from funds previously made available to the NIH Office of the Director. Specifically, the bill transfers unobligated funding from the NIH Office of the Director and merges it with other NIH funding for biorepositories of pediatric cancer specimens and research on pediatric cancer survivorship. The bill also rescinds additional funding that was provided to the NIH Office of the Director.

Sponsors: Rep. Norman, Ralph [R-SC-5]

Target Audience

Population: Children and adolescents with cancer

Estimated Size: 15000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 8 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I just hope I get better soon so I can play with my friends.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Oncologist specializing in pediatric cancers (Houston, TX)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could fast-track some promising research into pediatric oncology.
  • More funds always bring hope for better treatment methods.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Research scientist focusing on pediatric cancers (Boston, MA)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy ensures sustained funding which is crucial for ongoing research.
  • Better funding could reduce our constraints and allow us to take on more ambitious projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Parent of a child with cancer (San Diego, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that could improve treatments or outcomes for my child is a relief.
  • The burden on parents is huge, so funding for more research is definitely needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 7

Cancer survivor, student (Miami, FL)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Research saved my life. More funding means more lives saved.
  • Though I'm in remission, I worry about relapse. New research brings hope.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Policy analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Redirecting funds to pediatric cancer research is a strategic move considering the growing need.
  • It would be interesting to see long-term impacts on healthcare costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Pediatric hospital administrator (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The impact of such policies is often miscalculated in the short term but substantial in the long term.
  • We need more initiatives like these to sustain and improve pediatric cancer care.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 8

Nurse in pediatric oncology (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Patients' families often discuss financial constraints, so more research funding can ease some worries.
  • This works well with current initiatives for personalized treatment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Philanthropist and CEO of pediatric cancer foundation (Denver, CO)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill is a victory for the pediatric cancer community.
  • It aligns with our mission and helps leverage additional funds and awareness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 10

Graduate student in medical research (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The additional research funding might ease my research progress and security.
  • Supports the upcoming research professionals by sustaining grants and opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 2: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 3: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations