Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8739

Bill Overview

Title: Hong Kong Business Integrity and Transparency Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Commerce to submit periodic reports to Congress on the protection of consumer information in the possession of U.S. firms operating in Hong Kong. The report must include information on requests by the government of Hong Kong for consumer information, content takedowns, or law enforcement assistance.

Sponsors: Rep. Curtis, John R. [R-UT-3]

Target Audience

Population: Consumers doing business with U.S. firms in Hong Kong

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tech Startup Owner (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a business owner, I'm all for accountability and transparency, but constant reporting could become burdensome if not streamlined.
  • I hope this doesn't discourage business operations between the U.S. and Hong Kong.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Financial Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased transparency could influence how markets perceive these firms, possibly improving trust in trading.
  • It might add some compliance costs but could prevent larger issues long-term.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

American Teacher (Hong Kong)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'd like to ensure my personal data stays private, so this policy is reassuring.
  • It's good to know my home country is taking steps towards greater transparency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Privacy Activist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 55 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative is a step in the right direction, but more substantial legislation is needed.
  • The effectiveness will largely depend on enforcement and real penalties for non-compliance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Marketing Executive (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could affect advertising strategies if it limits data availability.
  • Understanding compliance requirements will be key to mitigate risks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Accountant (Hong Kong)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about data misuse, so this bill is somewhat comforting.
  • It's essential for my trust in using these services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Software Developer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a developer, my job might get more complicated with additional report requirements.
  • I also see the value in ensuring that data is secure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Corporate Lawyer (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is likely to create new legal landscapes we have to navigate.
  • I see potential benefits for clients in preventing misuse and building consumer trust.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Research Scientist (Boston, MA)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Data protection strengthens credibility, but I am concerned about data access restrictions affecting my work.
  • If handled well, it will serve both protection and accessibility.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

IT Security Consultant (San Diego, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could create more demand for IT security consultation.
  • A structured reporting requirement can enhance data security but also introduces new complexities particularly if vague.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1500000)

Year 2: $900000 (Low: $700000, High: $1400000)

Year 3: $900000 (Low: $700000, High: $1400000)

Year 5: $850000 (Low: $650000, High: $1300000)

Year 10: $800000 (Low: $600000, High: $1200000)

Year 100: $800000 (Low: $600000, High: $1200000)

Key Considerations