Bill Overview
Title: Veteran Recruitment Act
Description: This bill requires the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for Global Media to develop and implement plans to ensure that veterans receive priority hiring recruitment. The bill also requires the State Department to align Foreign Service positions with military ranks and to expand outreach efforts in recruiting veterans for the Foreign Service.
Sponsors: Rep. Herrell, Yvette [R-NM-2]
Target Audience
Population: Veterans
Estimated Size: 19000000
- The bill specifically focuses on veterans by ensuring priority in hiring for certain government roles.
- Veterans, especially those interested in Foreign Service careers, will be directly impacted as it provides them with new employment opportunities.
- The efforts of the State Department and the U.S. Agency for Global Media to align military ranks with Foreign Service positions may make these careers more appealing to veterans.
Reasoning
- Veterans are specifically targeted by this policy, so it's important to focus on their demographic, but also include some interviews with non-veterans to capture indirect effects like potential public support or acknowledgment.
- Approximately 19 million veterans are in the U.S., but not all would be seeking the specific positions in Foreign Service, thus the most significant impact would be on those currently seeking employment opportunities.
- Non-veterans might be minimally affected, as this policy doesn't directly impact their job prospects unless there is a shift in related employment fields.
- The budget constraints suggest that the implementation efforts will need to be efficient and may only reach a fraction of potential beneficiaries in the first year.
Simulated Interviews
Unemployed Veteran (Virginia)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is a great opportunity for veterans like me who want to continue serving in government roles.
- Aligning ranks with positions could make the transition smoother for us.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
IT Specialist (California)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think it's great for veterans wanting these roles, but I'm focused on the private sector in IT.
- It might not impact me directly, but I support veteran employment initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Junior Diplomat (Texas)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support the initiative as it could enhance our diplomatic corps with unique skills and perspectives veterans offer.
- It's important to ensure non-veteran diplomats still have fair opportunities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Government Contractor (Florida)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy gives me hope that my experience will translate well into something new within the Foreign Service.
- Aligning ranks with positions could level the playing field.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Student (New York)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This initiative directly aligns with my career goals post-graduation.
- It's promising to see planned outreach efforts for veterans in Foreign Service roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 7 |
Office Manager (Colorado)
Age: 27 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support policies that help veterans find fulfilling employment post-service.
- While not directly affected, I believe my family members could benefit in similar situations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Academic (Georgia)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might act as a valuable case study for effective veteran reintegration.
- Direct impact on my personal life is minimal, but there's professional curiosity.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Public Health Official (Ohio)
Age: 41 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Aligning ranks with positions appeals to me as it seems fair and strategic.
- This could increase my interest in transitioning to a governmental role.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Retired (Texas)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I find it heartwarming that current generations are being given such opportunities.
- This won't affect me directly, but I support initiatives that honor veterans.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Marketing Director (Illinois)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could provide a secure opportunity to transition to a government role with stable benefits.
- It gives me more confidence in pursuing opportunities that align with my skills and experience.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 2: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 3: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 5: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 10: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 100: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Key Considerations
- The implementation costs might fluctuate depending on the scale and scope of the recruitment and alignment strategies.
- Future adjustments to policy details or strategies for veteran recruitment may require additional funding.
- The long-term benefits of improved recruitment and alignment might outweigh the short-term costs if veteran integration into these roles proves successful.