Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8685

Bill Overview

Title: Afghan Adjustment Act

Description: This bill expands eligibility for special immigrant visas to certain Afghan nationals (and accompanying spouse and children) and addresses related issues. The Department of Homeland Security may provide such visas to Afghan nationals who provided qualifying service as a member of the Afghan Air Force or other specified entities and meet eligibility requirements, such as passing a background check. Currently, special immigrant visas for Afghan nationals are generally only available to those who were employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government in Afghanistan. Such visas shall also be available to an Afghan national who is a qualifying relative of a veteran or member of the U.S. Armed Forces. The bill also modifies procedures for providing lawful permanent resident status to certain classes of Afghan nationals, such as by (1) providing a streamlined process with specified vetting requirements for certain individuals, including those who provided support to the U.S. government in Afghanistan; and (2) preserving the eligibility of certain battered spouses whose eligibility for such status stemmed from a marriage that has terminated. Furthermore, the Department of State (1) must respond to inquiries from Members of Congress about specific applications from Afghan nationals seeking special immigrant or refugee status; and (2) establish an office in Afghanistan to perform certain tasks, such as issuing visas, if no U.S. embassies are operational in Afghanistan. The President must establish a task force to develop and implement a strategy to assist Afghan nationals who qualify for admission to the United States.

Sponsors: Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3]

Target Audience

Population: Afghan nationals eligible for special immigrant visas and adjustments.

Estimated Size: 70000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tech Consultant (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad there's an opportunity for more Afghans to join us here and start a new life.
  • The process needs to be transparent and efficient; I've seen many friends struggle with the bureaucracy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Community Organizer (Dearborn, MI)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The Afghan Adjustment Act is a step in the right direction, easing some of the burdens on displaced families.
  • We need more resources on the ground to handle the influx and ensure people are settled safely.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired U.S. Army Veteran (New York, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill offers justice to those who stood by us during our missions in Afghanistan.
  • I hope the implementation isn't bogged down by political red tape.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Student (Houston, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've been waiting for an opportunity like this to secure my future here.
  • The complexities of immigration can be overwhelming, a smoother process would be life-changing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is comprehensive but implementation will be key, particularly given the budget constraints.
  • Coordination between agencies will be crucial to its success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

School Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill can aid families that have been through so much trauma and displacement.
  • Providing a stable environment for students is crucial for their success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

College Graduate (Chicago, IL)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a beacon of hope for me and many others still in limbo.
  • I trust that my application will be processed fairly and swiftly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Social Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With this policy, there can be more resources and a systematic process for resettlement.
  • The well-being of refugees often depends on how quickly they can start leading normal lives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Small Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our community is built on diversity and this can bring even more talents here.
  • I hope that these new citizens will have as much opportunity as I did.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Program Director for NGO (Minneapolis, MN)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act can help stabilize many individuals who aim to rebuild their lives here.
  • The challenge will be making sure the implementation is not just a political promise.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Year 2: $245000000 (Low: $195000000, High: $295000000)

Year 3: $240000000 (Low: $190000000, High: $290000000)

Year 5: $230000000 (Low: $185000000, High: $275000000)

Year 10: $220000000 (Low: $180000000, High: $270000000)

Year 100: $220000000 (Low: $180000000, High: $270000000)

Key Considerations