Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8659

Bill Overview

Title: AVERT Future Violence Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the National Institute of Justice within the Department of Justice (DOJ) to study the factors that contribute to acts of animal cruelty. The report must also analyze acts of animal cruelty as a predictor of future violence against humans. Additionally, the bill authorizes DOJ to establish a grant program to support the development and strengthening of detection strategies and early intervention or diversion resources to stop acts of animal cruelty and rehabilitate offenders.

Sponsors: Rep. Clark, Katherine M. [D-MA-5]

Target Audience

Population: People impacted by efforts to reduce animal cruelty and future violence

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Animal Shelter Worker (Boston, MA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could really help us identify trends and intervene earlier.
  • I hope it leads to more funding and support for shelters like ours.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Police Officer (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see how animal cruelty can be an indicator for other types of violence.
  • With better training and resources, we could proactively prevent more serious crimes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Social Worker (Portland, OR)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Intervention at the animal violence level could deescalate domestic or societal violence later.
  • Glad to see some legislative action in this domain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

College Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Finding early intervention strategies for animal violence seems smart.
  • Could make a difference in campus safety and beyond.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

Lawyer (Miami, FL)

Age: 51 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The potential for diversion programs offers new avenues for resolving such cases.
  • A good move for rehabilitating offenders rather than just penalizing them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Researcher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The federal study could provide invaluable data in my field.
  • I am hopeful that grants may assist in expanding academic research projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 10 7

Veterinary Technician (New York City, NY)

Age: 26 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Educational and intervention programs could significantly support our work in animal rescues.
  • Prevention should be a key aspect alongside punishment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 10 8

Retired (Denver, CO)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy should've been implemented sooner. It seems very forward-thinking and humane.
  • Hope this leads to fewer cases of animal abuse.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

High School Teacher (Dallas, TX)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Programs supporting animal welfare could enrich education as well.
  • There's potential to teach students about empathy and consequences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Psychologist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Early intervention could help in treating root causes of future offending behavior.
  • This aligns with trauma-informed care principles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 2: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 3: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 5: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 10: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 100: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Key Considerations