Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/8613

Bill Overview

Title: Supporting the Health and Safety of Law Enforcement Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes a pilot program to promote coordination between community mental health centers and law enforcement agencies. Specifically, it directs the Department of Justice to award grants for community mental health centers to place social workers with law enforcement agencies. The purpose of the placement is to facilitate coordination on law enforcement cases with an underlying mental health component.

Sponsors: Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-10]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals involved in law enforcement or affected by mental health-related law enforcement actions

Estimated Size: 53000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Police Officer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having social workers on our team could really help us handle mental health crises more effectively.
  • I believe it will reduce confrontation and improve the safety of both officers and the community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Community Mental Health Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This grant could help us reach more people by coordinating closely with the police.
  • I expect we'll see a reduction in the criminalization of mental health issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Social Worker (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I look forward to bridging the gap between mental health services and law enforcement.
  • This could significantly improve the situational response and provide better outcomes for those in crisis.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Retired (Houston, TX)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this program reduces unnecessary arrests and improves how people are treated when the police are involved.
  • I think it might improve community trust over time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

College Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It sounds like a good step towards treating mental health issues with more care in the legal system.
  • I hope it gives officers better tools for de-escalation in mental health situations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Law Enforcement Trainer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 51 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Integrating social workers could make training more effective by providing real-time insights.
  • It's crucial for improving officer decision-making in the field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Public Defender (Miami, FL)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might help reduce incarceration rates for people with mental health issues.
  • Better inter-agency coordination is necessary for systemic change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Psychiatrist (Denver, CO)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Placing social workers with police might lead to better outcomes for my patients.
  • It takes a community approach to truly address these issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

Program Analyst (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could improve data collection on mental health calls and their outcomes.
  • A proactive measure that could inform future policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Graduate Student (Baltimore, MD)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I think the policy is in the right direction, it’s unlikely to affect me directly as a student.
  • I'm hopeful about its potential to drive meaningful change in policing strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Year 2: $31000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $41000000)

Year 3: $32000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $42000000)

Year 5: $35000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $45000000)

Year 10: $40000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $50000000)

Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Key Considerations